2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the extracellular matrix on water mobility in subcortical gray matter

Abstract: Purpose Water mobility in tissues is related to the microstructure that modulates diffusion and spin relaxation. Previous work has shown that the extracellular matrix (ECM) impacts water diffusion in cartilage. To investigate if similar contributions to image contrast exist for brain, which is characterized by a substantially lower ECM content, diffusion and relaxation were studied in fixed samples from goat and human thalamus before and after enzymatic digestion of ECM compounds. Selected experiments in human… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes both GM [ e.g ., (Horton & Hocking, 1997)] and WM [ e.g ., (Kozlowski et al ., 2008)] as well as a reduced power of resolving fibers in myelin-dense areas with MBP staining in comparison to Gallyas’ method (Pistorio et al ., 2006). We note that MBP is located in the myelin main period and that low-molecular mass dyes ( e.g ., antibodies to the MBP antigen) do not penetrate the membranes in compact myelin but have to diffuse circumferentially to reach the central laminae of the sheath (Georgi et al ., 2019; Labadie et al ., 2014). An apparently reduced IOD observed with anti-MBP immunostaining in WM regions of known high myelination might, therefore, reflect diffusion-limited access of the antibodies with less efficient staining of central laminae during the staining procedure due to later arrival times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes both GM [ e.g ., (Horton & Hocking, 1997)] and WM [ e.g ., (Kozlowski et al ., 2008)] as well as a reduced power of resolving fibers in myelin-dense areas with MBP staining in comparison to Gallyas’ method (Pistorio et al ., 2006). We note that MBP is located in the myelin main period and that low-molecular mass dyes ( e.g ., antibodies to the MBP antigen) do not penetrate the membranes in compact myelin but have to diffuse circumferentially to reach the central laminae of the sheath (Georgi et al ., 2019; Labadie et al ., 2014). An apparently reduced IOD observed with anti-MBP immunostaining in WM regions of known high myelination might, therefore, reflect diffusion-limited access of the antibodies with less efficient staining of central laminae during the staining procedure due to later arrival times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a closer qualitative voxel-wise comparison of estimated fiber densities suggests—in several instances—that HARSI-based results indicate separated lobes of similar size in two main directions, whereas HARDI-based ODFs appear to point more towards a main direction, with smaller sized lobes existing towards other directions. It is well documented that the water diffusion coefficient (at ambient temperature) is reduced to 30–50% of the in-vivo value (at body temperature) after in-situ perfusion fixation (Sun et al, 2003), with further alterations occurring during the post-mortem interval (i.e., the interval between death and fixation) (D’Arceuil & de Crespigny, 2007; Miller et al, 2011) and during fixation (Georgi et al, 2019; Yong-Hing et al, 2005). Diffusion anisotropy reductions in WM have also been observed (D’Arceuil & de Crespigny, 2007; Miller et al, 2011), which may be related to increased membrane permeability (Shepherd et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%