2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-017-4299-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Heterogeneous Nucleation Sites on the Kinetics of Intermetallic Phase Formation in Aged Duplex Stainless Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of this secondary phase is distributed in the rolling direction of the sample, involving the ferrite phase. It is also possible the precipitation of both sigma and chi phases simultaneously at a particular temperature and some residual chi phase can also be detected while the sigma phase progresses in its precipitation [3,5,22,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]; this is why both phases are observed in Figure 5a.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolution After Carburizing Process and Shormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of this secondary phase is distributed in the rolling direction of the sample, involving the ferrite phase. It is also possible the precipitation of both sigma and chi phases simultaneously at a particular temperature and some residual chi phase can also be detected while the sigma phase progresses in its precipitation [3,5,22,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36]; this is why both phases are observed in Figure 5a.…”
Section: Microstructural Evolution After Carburizing Process and Shormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been verified that the critical formation time for σ or other phases depends on several factors such as the amount of Cr, Mo and N, the solution treatment temperature and for the most part on the cooling rate during quenching: higher the cooling rate, lower the amount of precipitated phases [12,13]. From previous works, the critical cooling rate for 2205 has been established at 0.35 °C/s and for 2507 has been estimated as being higher than approximately 0.8÷0.9 °C/s, when a final σ-phase content of about 0.2% was obtained [13,14].The precipitation kinetics of secondary phases becomes faster by finer ferrite and austenite grain size [8], due to the higher grain boundary surface, serving as preferential nucleation site [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite these technological aspects, a complete and definitive description of secondary phases formation in DSSs is still unavailable and several different precipitation sequences of various intermetallic phases have been proposed. Some authors [3,4,8,9] suggest that the precipitation of σ-phase is associated with intermediate precipitation of χ-phase, which subsequently transforms into σ-phase, while some other authors associate the phases formation to nitrides precipitation [10].Also, in lean duplex stainless steels the precipitation of σ was observed without any χ-phase precipitation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these technological aspects, a complete and definitive description of secondary phases formation in DSSs is still unavailable and several different precipitation sequences of various intermetallic phases have been proposed. Some authors [3,4,8,9] suggest that the precipitation of σ-phase is associated with intermediate precipitation of χ-phase, which subsequently transforms into σ-phase, while some other authors associate the phase formations to nitride precipitation [10]. Additionally, in lean duplex stainless steels, the precipitation of σ was observed without any χ-phase precipitation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%