1986
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.38.1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the IMF azimuthal component on magnetospheric substorm dynamics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For five selected events which had no obvious IMF trigger, By was negative for two, made a negative to positive transition for one, was near zero for another, and for only one case was it positive. These observations tend to support the report of TROSCHICHEV et al (1986), that the triggering probability is enhanced in the presence of a negative By component. estimates.…”
Section: Role Of the Azimuthal Component By On Substorm Triggeringsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For five selected events which had no obvious IMF trigger, By was negative for two, made a negative to positive transition for one, was near zero for another, and for only one case was it positive. These observations tend to support the report of TROSCHICHEV et al (1986), that the triggering probability is enhanced in the presence of a negative By component. estimates.…”
Section: Role Of the Azimuthal Component By On Substorm Triggeringsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In an accompanying paper by TROSCHICHEV et al (1986) it is reported that the azimuthal component of the IMF can have significant effects on the AL index. One such effect occurs during winter season and causes an enhancement of AL when By changes from positive to negative at a time of southward Bz.…”
Section: Role Of the Azimuthal Component By On Substorm Triggeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R2 FAC, upward at the morning side and downward at the evening side, connect to the ring current region at 4-6 Re and close through a partial ring current flowing from the morning to the evening side near equator (Iijima & Potemra, 1976a,b). The polar ionospheric convection and current systems that could affect the magnetic variations measured from ground within the central polar cap could be divided into distinct categories, DP1, DP2, DP3 (or NBZ), and DP4 (or DPY) characterized by their relation to substorm activity and interplanetary magnetic field conditions (e.g., Wilhjelm et al, 1972;Friis-Christensen & Wilhjelm, 1975;Troshichev et al, 1986;Weimer et al, 2010). Each type of convection pattern comprise field-aligned currents (FAC) and horizontal Hall and Pedersen currents.…”
Section: High-latitude Response To Solar Wind-magnetosphere Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the validity of the results of our case studies needs to be ascertained and established through analysis of a large number of carefully identified IMF-triggered substorms. Further work is also required to characterize the effects on the dayside equatorial magnetic field of substorms without any identifiable external IMF trigger [Henderson et al, 1996], substorms triggered exclusively by changes in IMF By [Troshichev et al, 1986], and substorms induced by enhancements in solar wind dynamic pressure [e.g., Kokubun et al, 1977].…”
Section: Event Of August 19 1978mentioning
confidence: 99%