2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0016793220060158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Ionosphere on the Parameters of the GPS Navigation Signals during a Geomagnetic Substorm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis shows that the scintillation level for GLONASS and GPS satellites is higher at L2 for the events considered than at L1. This result check well with those obtained earlier in [Zakharov et al, 2016;. The statistical analysis of GPS signals for 2010-2014 for IGS and CHAIN network stations, located in the Arctic region (north of 55° N), has shown that the probability of phase slips at L2 is almost 10 times greater than at L1 for G3-class magnetic storms and substorms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis shows that the scintillation level for GLONASS and GPS satellites is higher at L2 for the events considered than at L1. This result check well with those obtained earlier in [Zakharov et al, 2016;. The statistical analysis of GPS signals for 2010-2014 for IGS and CHAIN network stations, located in the Arctic region (north of 55° N), has shown that the probability of phase slips at L2 is almost 10 times greater than at L1 for G3-class magnetic storms and substorms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At midlatitudes, on the contrary, the stability in measuring pseudorange at the fundamental frequency for GPS is higher than for GLONASS. In [Zakharov et al, 2016, it has been demonstrated that the probability of a phase slip at L2, even under quiet conditions, is 3 to 15 times higher than at L1. A similar ratio is true of the slip probabilities for P2 and P1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At some monitoring stations at midlatitudes, the GPS positioning error in the PPP mode may increase five times relative to the background level and reach 0.5 m [Yasyukevich et al, 2020b] (Figure 8), although for most storms it does not exceed 0.3 m [Luo et al, 2018]. Optical data confirms that GNSS signal losses of lock are associated with auroral particle precipitation in the high-latitude ionosphere [Zakharov et al, 2020]. It has also been found that upon expansion of the auroral oval to midlatitudes the region of increased positioning errors in different modes shifts in the same direction [Demyanov, Yasyukevich, 2014;Afraimovich et al, 2009a;Yasyukevich et al, 2020b].…”
Section: Experimental Observations Of the Impact Of Geomagnetic Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The variation of the above metrics during a magnetic storm is demonstrated in Figure 1. Magnetic storm events are usually categorized into three phases: Initial phase, main phase, and recovery phase regarding the change in the Dst index [57,58]. The 5 November magnetic storm event began around 8:00 p.m. when the Dst index was trending up, the IMF Bz was trending down, and the solar wind speeds spiked into the initial phase.…”
Section: Analysis Of Weather Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%