2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021ea001952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Lander Size and Shape on the Ballistic Landing Motion

Abstract: This article investigates the ballistic landing motion and final distribution of the landers in different sizes or shapes near the small celestial body. Three typical shapes, including cubic, cuboid, and cylindrical, are considered for the landers deployed to a tri‐axial ellipsoid model. The Polygonal Contact Model (PCM) is used to detect the contact/collision, where the Hertz model is applied to calculate the continuous contact force. Different‐sized cubic landers (in the edge length of 20, 30, 40, and 50 cm)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[18]). It was shown previously in [16], [17], and [19] that the shape of the lander has a significant impact on its surface motion. Considering the spacecraft shape allows the effects like frictional torque and rolling resistance to be modeled, however it also requires an accurate shape of the body to be implemented.…”
Section: Surface Motionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18]). It was shown previously in [16], [17], and [19] that the shape of the lander has a significant impact on its surface motion. Considering the spacecraft shape allows the effects like frictional torque and rolling resistance to be modeled, however it also requires an accurate shape of the body to be implemented.…”
Section: Surface Motionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These methods give insight into what dynamically is the minimum touchdown velocity of a certain location, but it cannot consider any additional constraints on the trajectory itself. The bouncing and surface motion of landers has also been investigated in detail in [15], [16], [17], [18], and [19]. These studies highlight the importance of implementing accurate and efficient models for the dynamics of this phase of the landing trajectory design as well as it can have a large influence on to the lander settling location and success of the landing itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[108]将着陆器的姿态旋转视作控制变量, 讨论了通过 控制着陆器自转辅助着陆的可行性. Zeng等人 [109,110] 则深入分析了立方体着陆器在小天体碎石地表和可变 形风化层表面的运动情况, 关于上述典型地形的讨论 将留作下节详细说明. 特别地, 在着陆器总质量和初 10) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravel.…”
Section: 析了几类正多面体外形的着陆规律 在最近的工作中unclassified
“…体更早停止表面运动 [109] . 刚体着陆器自由下落至小天体弱引力地表时都会 发生碰撞反弹, 在着陆器无法通过主动控制实现软着 陆情况下, 被动稳定着陆器或增加系统能量耗散的结 构成为新的设计方向.…”
Section: 始释放机械能一致的情况下 仿真表明长方体比立方unclassified