2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the meso-structure in dynamic fracture simulation of concrete under tensile loading

Abstract: We investigate the dynamic behavior of concrete in relation to its composition within a computational framework (FEM). Concrete is modeled using a meso-mechanical approach in which aggregates and mortar are represented explicitly. Both continuum phases are considered to behave elastically, while nucleation, coalescence and propagation of cracks are modeled using the cohesive-element approach. In order to understand the loading-rate sensitivity of concrete, we simulate direct tensile-tests for strain rates rang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the simulation-box size is an additional length scale in our simulations, and the interplay of all length scales is crucial for the understanding of the obtained results. The cohesive zone must contain several elements (typically around four [31]) and should be small compared to the sample size for mesh independency. The average element size for the analyses, which is the average side length for a regular tetrahedron element, is 2.1 mm.…”
Section: Cohesive Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the simulation-box size is an additional length scale in our simulations, and the interplay of all length scales is crucial for the understanding of the obtained results. The cohesive zone must contain several elements (typically around four [31]) and should be small compared to the sample size for mesh independency. The average element size for the analyses, which is the average side length for a regular tetrahedron element, is 2.1 mm.…”
Section: Cohesive Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, [36] show that the confined compression test response is prevents us from using it to conduct an accurate identification of the friction coefficient. For this reason, this coefficient is set to an average value µ = 0.7, which leads to a coherent ductility.…”
Section: Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the retardation of micro-cracking at high deformation rates associated to micro and meso-scale inertia effects can be analyzed by rate-independent constitutive theories as long as the material is discretized in all its phases [24]. However, in a homogeneous (macro-scale) representation of the material this part of the rate effects has to be explicitly modeled [25]; i.e.…”
Section: Rate-dependent Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%