2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Minimum Chip Thickness on the Obtained Surface Roughness During Turning Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the theoretical geometrical surface roughness is primarily a function of the feed rate for a given nose radius and varies with the square of the feed rate value. This is in good agreement with the established following equation (Davim et al, 2008;Schultheiss et al, 2014).…”
Section: Surface Roughnesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is well known that the theoretical geometrical surface roughness is primarily a function of the feed rate for a given nose radius and varies with the square of the feed rate value. This is in good agreement with the established following equation (Davim et al, 2008;Schultheiss et al, 2014).…”
Section: Surface Roughnesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The reliable estimation of minimum uncut chip thickness has also the significant meaning in relation to the surface roughness prediction. According to Schultheiss et al [46], the application of the surface roughness model considering kinematic-geometric dependencies and elastic-plastic deformations of work piece (related to h min ) enables the accurate prediction of Ra and Rz roughness parameters during precision turning with low feed values. Therefore, the results obtained in this research can be further applied to the optimal selection of cutting parameters during LAM of WC/NiCr clad layers, enabling the obtainment of high surface quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through expanding the analytical equation, Eq. 1, a more accurate model could be obtained as validated through previous research [12], Eq. 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%