2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000060529.30157.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Number of Alcohol and Water Bottles on Murine Alcohol Intake

Abstract: Alcohol intake is strongly influenced by availability. The results point to a simple method of manipulating murine alcohol intake over a wide range. They provide an animal model that might be useful for understanding the influence of alcohol availability on human alcohol consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-bottle preference assays with water and either 3% sucrose or 0.2% saccharin (Krishnan et al, 2007; Tordoff and Bachmanov, 2003) were performed using wild-type and Fgf21 -transgenic (Tg) mice expressing supraphysiological concentrations of FGF21 (Inagaki et al, 2007). Saccharin was included to eliminate the potentially confounding effect of caloric content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-bottle preference assays with water and either 3% sucrose or 0.2% saccharin (Krishnan et al, 2007; Tordoff and Bachmanov, 2003) were performed using wild-type and Fgf21 -transgenic (Tg) mice expressing supraphysiological concentrations of FGF21 (Inagaki et al, 2007). Saccharin was included to eliminate the potentially confounding effect of caloric content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monkeys were provided standard lab diet 5K91 (LabDiet, St. Louis, MO) supplemented once a day with fruits and peanuts. The two-bottle saccharin preference assay was performed as described (Tordoff and Bachmanov, 2003). The monkeys underwent a training period during which the standard water system was shut off and 2 bottles, one with water and the other with water containing 0.2% saccharin, were attached side-by-side to the cage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consumption of more alcohol and less water by CFA-treated males likely reflects increases in alcohol preference following repeated drug exposure. Although reductions in water intake is not characteristic for escalations in voluntary alcohol consumption (Griffin, 2014; Hwa et al, 2011; Tordoff and Bachmanov, 2008), it has been reported that mice treated with pro-inflammatory agents exhibit increased alcohol intake and reduced water intake when given access to CA2BC (Biesmans et al, 2013; Blednov et al, 2011; Stein et al, 1988). This is consistent with parallel studies showing that the impairment of pro-inflammatory cytokines reduces alcohol preference (Blednov et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, adolescents are particularly prone to drink alcohol to intoxication (Hopson, 2013; see Broadwater et al ., 2013), perhaps due to multiple differences in alcohol sensitivity compared to adults (Spear, 2014). Finally, the mere presence of multiple ethanol sippers in the home cage relative to water sippers can increase ethanol intake up to ≈20 g/kg/day in adult B6 mice (Tordoff and Bachmanov, 2003). Taken together, we hypothesize that the confluence of [i] sweetened ethanol (beginning at 3%) availability and [ii] social isolation [iii] during adolescence, along with [iv] two ethanol sippers, which constitutes four independent susceptibility factors, accounts for the high levels of voluntary consumption reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%