2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46212-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Orientation of Steel Parts Produced by DMLS on the Fatigue Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specifications describe the accuracy of the testing apparatus, the testing procedure and presentation of the fatigue testing results. The standard, as well as the references, [20][21][22][23] describe also in details the shape, dimensions and preparation of the samples, which consist of two mounting heads and a gage between them. During a test, a sample rotates under a constant bending moment over the gage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specifications describe the accuracy of the testing apparatus, the testing procedure and presentation of the fatigue testing results. The standard, as well as the references, [20][21][22][23] describe also in details the shape, dimensions and preparation of the samples, which consist of two mounting heads and a gage between them. During a test, a sample rotates under a constant bending moment over the gage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 A comparison of the results of fatigue tests obtained for the two steel materials is presented in the literature. 23 The experimental campaign was devised using the Design-of-Experiment approach and the results were analysed using the Analysis-of-Variance (ANOVA) methodology. 24 The results of the research established the influence of post-processing procedures and their order on the fatigue resistance of the MS1 produced by DMLS, 21 as well as the influence of build orientation, post-processing procedures and their order on the fatigue resistance of the stainless steel PH1 produced by DMLS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the TOPSIS technique is more sensitive to changes in baseline data than the SAW method, according to the findings of the MCDM sensitivity study (Dobrovolskienė & Pozniak, 2021). Bogojević et al (2020) studied on the influence of AM orientation on the fatigue behaviour of steel parts. The parts were made from Maraging Steel EOS MS1 and stainless steel EOS PH1 using direct laser metal sintering technique.…”
Section: Background Work On Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the findings, the fatigue strength of maraging steel samples is unaffected by the orientation of the structure. However, as compared to horizontal or vertical axis orientation, the fatigue strength of angled stainless steel samples is up to 20% higher (Bogojević et al, 2020). Among many research investigations, there is a gap in applying the empirical relationship by which one may estimate the dimensional deviation of the fabricated component in different orientations.…”
Section: Background Work On Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%