Influence of the Particle Size and Particle Size Ratio on the Morphology and Viscoelastic Properties of Bimodal Hard/Soft Latex Blends

Abstract

The morphology and viscoelastic properties of films prepared from bimodal latex blends containing equal weight fractions of soft and hard latex particles were investigated as a function of the particle sizes and the particle size ratio (soft particle diameter/hard particle diameter). Minimum film formation temperature (MFT) measurements were associated with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to emphasize the particle size ratio dependence of the film formation properties. A significant increase of the MFT values with the soft/hard particle size ratio was observed. As long as the particle size ratio was low, TEM micrographs showed that the film forming soft particles, undergoing complete coalescence, clearly act as the continuous phase where the non film forming hard particles are found evenly dispersed while keeping their initial spherical shape. At higher values of the particle size ratio, TEM micrographs pointed out that the soft particles are prevented from coming into contact with each other by the surrounding hard particles, therefore dramatically increasing the MFT of the sample and resulting in a non film forming latex blend. The existence of a critical volume fraction of hard particles that is directly related to the soft/hard particle size ratio was then established on the basis of geometrical arguments involving the percolation theory. The higher the particle size ratio, the lower the critical volume fraction of hard particles that leads to a macroscopic phase inversion resulting in a non film forming bimodal latex blend. Subsequently, the mechanical film properties were investigated by solid-state dynamic mechanical analysis. The size of the dispersed hard phase was found to affect the final viscoelastic film properties. The smaller the size of the hard particles, the better the mechanical enhancement of the mechanical film properties. Last, the experimental viscoelastic thermograms were compared with some theoretical predictions based on self-consistent mechanical modeling. The final film properties of the bimodal hard/soft latex blends were then directly connected to the film formation properties.

Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites

“…In addition, Christensen and Lo's three-phase model [126], Mori-Tanaka method, self-consistent method, Halpin and Kardos' model [127] of micromechanics can also be extended to account for the interface effect by including an interphase region between the matrix and particles [128,129]. For instance, Colombini et al [130,131] used the self-consistent scheme based on a ''particle-interphase-matrix" three-phase unit cell model to study the influence of the particle size and shape on the mechanical properties of bimodal hard/soft latex blends. They found that the smaller the size of the hard particles, the better the mechanical enhancement of the mechanical film properties.…”

Thermal analysis and topographical characterization of films of styrene‐butadiene blends

“…This is consistent with previously reported results that the spherical shape of hard particles is retained when the annealing temperate is below the T g of the hard component. 3,23 No voids were observed on the surface of the films made from pure Latex A and Latex B dispersions. 51 Although the addition of nonfilm-forming (hard) particles to a film-forming latex is known to generate voids in the film.…”

“…When the size ratio is slightly over 1.0 (as in the present case), the soft components are known to act as a continuous phase whereas hard particles disperse unevenly and voids are formed. 3 In the flat phase, the Latex A particles have lost their topographical identity, including their curvature at the latex-air interface [ Fig. 5(B)].…”

New waterborne acrylic binders for zero VOC paints

“…DMTA is a powerful technique for the study of blends of polymers. 15,16 Although only a relatively small amount of hard polymer was incorporated, this hard polymer seemed to dominate completely the mechanical properties of the film. In this specific case when only 16.5 wt% of hard polymer was added, the loss tangent tan d (E¢¢/E¢) showed the dominant presence of hard polymer.…”