2016
DOI: 10.3103/s0095452716030087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the PCR artifacts on the genotyping efficiency by the microsatellite loci using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, PCR amplification of genomic DNA using SSR markers can produce sequence artifacts because of errors in Taq DNA polymerase activity and the formation of chimeric and heteroduplex molecules [ 19 21 ]. The production of artifacts, particularly in the case of highly polymorphic SSR markers, can cause difficulties in allele size calling [ 22 ]. Alleles of the same sized products may have different sequences [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PCR amplification of genomic DNA using SSR markers can produce sequence artifacts because of errors in Taq DNA polymerase activity and the formation of chimeric and heteroduplex molecules [ 19 21 ]. The production of artifacts, particularly in the case of highly polymorphic SSR markers, can cause difficulties in allele size calling [ 22 ]. Alleles of the same sized products may have different sequences [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, a perfect PCR means all the amplified sequences are exactly the same as the original template(s). However, in reality, artificial molecules are frequently produced (Cline et al, 1996; Sharifian, 2010; Kulibaba and Liashenko, 2016). These artifacts include those derived from mutation, recombination (Brakenhoff et al, 1991; Komatsoulis and Waterman, 1997; Haas et al, 2011), and heteroduplex formation when double-stranded DNA contain sites with non-complementary bases such as A–C and G–T pairs (L’Abbé et al, 1992; Thompson et al, 2002; Kulibaba and Liashenko, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in reality, artificial molecules are frequently produced (Cline et al, 1996; Sharifian, 2010; Kulibaba and Liashenko, 2016). These artifacts include those derived from mutation, recombination (Brakenhoff et al, 1991; Komatsoulis and Waterman, 1997; Haas et al, 2011), and heteroduplex formation when double-stranded DNA contain sites with non-complementary bases such as A–C and G–T pairs (L’Abbé et al, 1992; Thompson et al, 2002; Kulibaba and Liashenko, 2016). Previous studies have shown that primer sequence matching, template length, the type of DNA polymerase, annealing temperature, extension time, and the number of PCR cycles could all contribute to the generation of PCR artifacts (Suzuki and Giovannoni, 1996; Polz and Cavanaugh, 1998; Suzuki et al, 1998; Ishii and Fukui, 2001; Kanagawa, 2003; Sharifian, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragments longer then 1000–1200 bp for TBP analysis and 2000 bp for h‐TBP analysis are reproducible and are involved in differentiation of hetero‐ and/or homoduplex DNA populations, what may be a possible explanation for these high‐molecular fragments formation during the amplification. These DNA duplexes are visualized by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel (Kulibaba and Liashenko, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%