2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the principal tensile stresses on delamination fracture mechanisms and their associated morphology for different loading modes in carbon/epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the preferential advance of the fracture is produced via the fiber/matrix interface associated with mode I fracture. Matrix rollers and cusps, associated with mode II fracture, can also be observed in this figure.…”
Section: Fractographic Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This indicates that the preferential advance of the fracture is produced via the fiber/matrix interface associated with mode I fracture. Matrix rollers and cusps, associated with mode II fracture, can also be observed in this figure.…”
Section: Fractographic Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For structures the behavior of the delamination is much like the CLS configuration, in which a combination of modes I, II and even III acts at the crack tip characterizing a mixed mode propagation. Consequently, the fracture morphology will be different from that in pure modes of propagation [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In general, the mode I component produces predominantly a smooth surface characterized by scarp formation that represents the action of peel stresses; meanwhile, the mode II component creates a surface roughness that is interpreted as shear stress dominant failure mode [9,11,12]. The scarp fracture pattern is formed by the coalescence of riverlines also related to the plastic microcreep fracture mechanism, which grows from neighboring fibers and converges into scarps [13][14][15]. Besides, riverlines may also indicate the crack propagation direction [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, surfaces preparation, adherents and adhesives types, the joint thickness and the temperature, must be studied during the manufacturing process [1]. It is known that the joining method is influenced by the breaking process, the way of breaking and the strength of the joint [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%