Influence of the prosthetic restoration design on the peri-implant bone loss.

Abstract

Background and Aim ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this retrospective study, SLA surface was less osseointegration failure rate than Anodized surface and RBM surface up to 1 year of loading. But further research is needed to consider other factors comprehensively that contribute to successful osseointegration. Methods and MaterialsThe medical records of patients treated with three implant surface types of implant between 2012 and 2015 at Asan Medical Center were reviewed. The primary outcome parameters were implant osseointegration failure rate. A thorough and complete review of the medical records of the enrolled patients was performed and all data were inserted into spreadsheets (Microsoft Excel 2007, Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). The statistical evaluation was performed by using SPSS statistics ver. 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, US).

Feedback on dental implants with dynamic navigation versus freehand

“…To accomplish this, the implants must be placed correctly to ensure a long-lasting and predictable prosthetic restoration. The available bone can be optimally utilised with three-dimensional (3D) prosthetic-based planning [3]. Such planning can be carried out with the help of computer-assisted surgical procedures.…”