1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500082722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Relative Time of Emergence of Wild Oat (Avena fatua) on Yield Loss of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Abstract: Multiple regression analysis of data from field experiments conducted in Alberta at two locations between 1972 and 1983 indicated that there was a significant relationship between yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) and wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) and relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatuaL. ♯ AVEFA). At a given wild oat density, percent yield loss increased the earlier wild oat emerged relative to the crops and gradually diminished the later it emerged. However, the magnitude of the yield lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
139
1
7

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
11
139
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As also reported by some researchers, earlier application timings provide higher grain yields (O´Donovan et al, 1985;FernandezQuintanilla et al, 2000and Barros et al, 2005, 2008. Even though the highest grain yields tended to be achieved with the highest doses for both herbicides at the first application timing, herbicide doses lower than the recommended (intermediate doses) were sufficient at both application timings to avoid significant yield losses, which is in accordance with Fernandez-Quintanilla et al (2000), Navarrete et al (2000) and Barros et al (2005Barros et al ( , 2007Barros et al ( , 2008.…”
Section: Grain Yieldsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As also reported by some researchers, earlier application timings provide higher grain yields (O´Donovan et al, 1985;FernandezQuintanilla et al, 2000and Barros et al, 2005, 2008. Even though the highest grain yields tended to be achieved with the highest doses for both herbicides at the first application timing, herbicide doses lower than the recommended (intermediate doses) were sufficient at both application timings to avoid significant yield losses, which is in accordance with Fernandez-Quintanilla et al (2000), Navarrete et al (2000) and Barros et al (2005Barros et al ( , 2007Barros et al ( , 2008.…”
Section: Grain Yieldsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results achieved in these experiments also show that the success of reduced herbicide doses depends on an early application timing, when the weeds are more sensitive to herbicides, which is in accordance with O´Donovan et al (1985) and Barros et al (2005Barros et al ( , 2007Barros et al ( , 2008. The H2 herbicide (amidosulfuron + Iodosulfuron -methyl) showed some difficulties in controlling Lavatera cretica L., Values followed by the same letter or letters are not significantly different at a 5% level (Duncan´s multiple range test) Figure 1.…”
Section: Weed Control Efficacysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Crop yield losses decline when weed emergence is delayed after sowing (Nieto et al 1968;Weaver 1984a). Year-to-year variation in crop yield losses at constant weed densities has been attributed to variation in weed size, which is thought to be in part a function of time of weed emergence (Spitters and Aerts 1983;Kropff et al 1984;O'Donovan et al 1985). However, the number of ASM levels in the present study was not adequate to detect a critical level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although some researchers have achieved interesting results in terms of weed detection and herbicide savings based on on-the-go weed detection systems and field surveys [56][57][58], they are time consuming and costly. It could delay the The optimization of weed management practices relies on timing weed control [51], as weed presence in the early crop season is a key component of the weed-crop competition and further yield loss [52,53]. Thus, it is essential to maintain a weed-controlled environment for the crop at these initial growth stages [54], making quick weed detection a crucial tool for preventing yield losses.…”
Section: Prescription Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%