2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.104441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the thermal interface resistance on the thermovoltage of a magnetic tunnel junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of Joule energy is released after the electrons tunneling in the receiving magnetic electrode adjacent to the MgO barrier. Therefore, considering that the thermal conductivity of thin MgO barrier is much lower than that of bulk MgO [21], the storage layer reaches up to 10% higher temperature if the current polarity is such that the storage layer receives the tunneling electrons. This effect becomes more significant in the case of MgO-based capping layer since the storage layer appears to be thermally insulated between two MgO layers with low thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of Joule energy is released after the electrons tunneling in the receiving magnetic electrode adjacent to the MgO barrier. Therefore, considering that the thermal conductivity of thin MgO barrier is much lower than that of bulk MgO [21], the storage layer reaches up to 10% higher temperature if the current polarity is such that the storage layer receives the tunneling electrons. This effect becomes more significant in the case of MgO-based capping layer since the storage layer appears to be thermally insulated between two MgO layers with low thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bandiera et al proposed a concept of thermally assisted STT-MRAM in which the heating due to the STT write current is also used to induce an anisotropy reorientation from out-ofplane to in-plane [20]. Moreover, recent experiments have shown that the MgO/CoFeB interface with thin MgO tunnel barrier have a much lower (more than two orders of magnitude) thermal conductivity than what could be expected from the bulk value [21]. In double barrier MTJs in which the storage layer is sandwiched between two MgO barriers, this further enhances the Joule heating of the storage layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is an ongoing discussion about the actual thermal conductivity of thin insulating films [25][26][27] . With the simulated temperature differences, the Seebeck coefficients for the MAO and the MgO MTJ with the highest TMS ratios are calculated (via TMS =…”
Section: Thermovoltages and Seebeck Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microscopic origin together with theoretical predictions of the TMS for multiple CoFe compositions with MgO barriers is given in reference [5,6] and is calculated by: TMS = ap − p min (| ap |, | p |) . (1) The TMS effect has been observed and analyzed for various combinations of barrier and electrode materials, showing thermovoltages in the μV range for MgO [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] andMgAl 2 O 4 [14,15], and reaching themV range for Heusler based MTJs [16]. All examined material configurations result in specific TMS ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%