2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2018-40
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the vapor wall loss on the degradation rate constants in chamber experiments of levoglucosan and other biomass burning markers

Abstract: Vapor wall loss has only recently been shown a potentially significant bias in atmospheric chamber studies. Yet, previous works aimed at the determination of the degradation rate of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) often did not account for this process. Here we evaluate the influence of vapor wall loss on the determination of the gas phase reaction rate of 15 several biomass burning markers (levoglucosan, mannosan, coniferyl aldehyde, 3-guaiacyl propanol, and acetosyringone) with hydroxyl radicals (OH)… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the loss rate, one would need to conduct a thorough investigation of several key parameters (e.g., each compound's saturation vapor concentration, particle mass accommodation coefficient, or equivalent organic mass concentration at the wall), which are not yet properly constrained within the existing literature. Investigation into vapor wall loss is beyond the scope of this paper but is addressed in Bertrand et al (2018). Concentrations reported here are not corrected for vapor wall loss.…”
Section: Particle Wall Loss Corrections (Pwlc) and Emission Factor (Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To estimate the loss rate, one would need to conduct a thorough investigation of several key parameters (e.g., each compound's saturation vapor concentration, particle mass accommodation coefficient, or equivalent organic mass concentration at the wall), which are not yet properly constrained within the existing literature. Investigation into vapor wall loss is beyond the scope of this paper but is addressed in Bertrand et al (2018). Concentrations reported here are not corrected for vapor wall loss.…”
Section: Particle Wall Loss Corrections (Pwlc) and Emission Factor (Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the k OH rate constant derived from these results must be regarded with caution. This is addressed in further detail in Bertrand et al (2018). .…”
Section: Primary Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the k OH rate constant derived from these results must be regarded with caution. This is addressed in further detail in Bertrand et al (2018 Figure 7. Mean enhancement ratios (ERs) of individual compounds in biomass burning emissions.…”
Section: Primary Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…often reported. These include levoglucosan, a sugar anhydride compound and by-product of the thermal degradation of cellulose and a commonly used tracer of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) in source apportionment (Waked et al, 2014;Bonvalot et al, 2016;Maenhaut et al, 2016), as well as methoxyphenols, by-products of the thermal degradation of lignin. In fresh emissions, the emission factors (EFs) of these compounds can vary with the type of fuel (hardwood, softwood, or herbaceous types; Schmidl et al, 2008b;Schauer et al, 2001;Fine et al, 2002Fine et al, , 2004, the type of fire (open fire, fire places, woodstove; Fine et al, 2002Fine et al, , 2004, or even the sampling setup (in an experimental stack, in a dilution tunnel, or ambient; Nussbaumer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%