2014
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/22/5/052006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the vibro-acoustic sensor position on cavitation detection in a Kaplan turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and feature selection are well-understood methods of developing health monitoring for systems, to our knowledge, this is the first work to apply this approach to hydroturbines. When compared to previous research aimed at comparing sensors, sensor placement, or CSPs, (Bajic, Services, Gmbh, & Zithe, 2003;Schmidt et al, 2014) our methodology uses a more objective, statistics-based approach to the evaluation process. It is important to note here that the method presented in this paper can discriminate between erosive and non-erosive cavitation which is important in the ultimate goal of determining RUL (not addressed in this paper).…”
Section: Specific Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and feature selection are well-understood methods of developing health monitoring for systems, to our knowledge, this is the first work to apply this approach to hydroturbines. When compared to previous research aimed at comparing sensors, sensor placement, or CSPs, (Bajic, Services, Gmbh, & Zithe, 2003;Schmidt et al, 2014) our methodology uses a more objective, statistics-based approach to the evaluation process. It is important to note here that the method presented in this paper can discriminate between erosive and non-erosive cavitation which is important in the ultimate goal of determining RUL (not addressed in this paper).…”
Section: Specific Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experimental setups, sensors are sometimes attached to other locations including the hydroturbine case, test stand frame, or directly to the hydroturbine shaft. Sensor placement and orientation on one of the above identified locations can significantly impact the signal response as (Schmidt et al, 2014) shows.…”
Section: Sensor Type and Sensor Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neill et al (1997) and Poddar and Tandon (2016) were able to detect cavitation incipience, their methods being based on the AE signals root mean squared (RMS) values that increase in amplitude and increasingly fluctuate when cavitation occurs. Analyzing parameters such as RMS and AE event energy and their fluctuation is a common approach, with typically good results (Boorsma and Fitzsimmons 2009;Boorsma and Whitworth 2011;Schmidt et al 2014Schmidt et al , 2015Look et al 2018). However, these calculated parameters lack the detection of individual cavitation impacts, as they tend to be temporally so close to each other that the parameter averaging interprets them as one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since visual detection of cavitation in a hydraulic power plant is not an option, acoustic event detection offers an alternative. Existing methods [1,2,3] rely on analyzing acoustics signals by designing statistical or handcrafted features, e.g. kurtosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%