2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the WRF model and atmospheric reanalysis on the offshore wind resource potential and cost estimation: A case study for Rio de Janeiro State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atmospheric reanalysis demonstrates good performance compared to offshore observations [25,26]. Reanalysis can demonstrate similar or superior performance compared to meso-scale models for offshore applications in regions far from topographical influences [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Atmospheric reanalysis demonstrates good performance compared to offshore observations [25,26]. Reanalysis can demonstrate similar or superior performance compared to meso-scale models for offshore applications in regions far from topographical influences [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ERA5 is a popular global reanalysis model (Hersbach et al, 2020) utilised for wind energy resource assessments in a variety of ways, including as a standalone product, as input boundary conditions to higher-resolution model runs, and as a reference dataset for MCP with local observations (Olauson, 2018;Soares et al, 2020;Hayes et al, 2021;de Assis Tavares et al, 2022). ERA5 is developed by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and provides meteorological data from 1950-present at 1-hour temporal resolution with a horizontal grid spacing of 0.25° (Hersbach et al, 2020).…”
Section: Reanalysis Model For Long-term Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind power density is a key parameter widely used for assessing the potential for wind energy generation in a given location. This method that does not take into account the specific turbine technology [65,66].…”
Section: Wind Power Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%