2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/1046459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Treadmill Speed and Perturbation Intensity on Selection of Balancing Strategies during Slow Walking Perturbed in the Frontal Plane

Abstract: Background. Common understanding is that adequate foot placement (stepping strategy) is crucial in maintaining stability during walking at normal speed. The aim of this study was to investigate strategies that humans use to cope with lateral perturbations during very slow walking. Methods. Ten healthy individuals underwent an experimental protocol whereby a set of perturbations directed inward (medially to a stance leg) and outward (laterally to a stance leg) of three intensities (F1=5%, F2=10%, and F3=15% of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
71
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delaying the corrective action resulted in higher COM displacement, which is in agreement with ndings from other perturbation studies conducted in healthy and post-stroke subjects (Haarman et al, 2017;Matjačić et al, 2018. However, when perturbations were directed inward both control and UTA subjects reacted primarily with a stepping response by making the next step wider, regardless whether healthy, nonamputated or amputated leg was in stance phase (Vlutters et al 2018;Bruijn and Dieen, 2018;Matjačić et al, 2019).…”
Section: Dynamic Balancing Responsessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Delaying the corrective action resulted in higher COM displacement, which is in agreement with ndings from other perturbation studies conducted in healthy and post-stroke subjects (Haarman et al, 2017;Matjačić et al, 2018. However, when perturbations were directed inward both control and UTA subjects reacted primarily with a stepping response by making the next step wider, regardless whether healthy, nonamputated or amputated leg was in stance phase (Vlutters et al 2018;Bruijn and Dieen, 2018;Matjačić et al, 2019).…”
Section: Dynamic Balancing Responsessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This re ected in modulation of COP and GRF under the stance leg which has already been addressed in the literature (Hof 2007; Matjačić et al, 2019). Acting against perturbation during the stance phase is e cient as it quickly minimizes deviation of COM and restores stability (Hof et al, 2010, Matjačić et al, 2019. Likewise, when perturbed at the beginning of the stance phase on nonamputated side UTA subjects were also able to appropriately modulate COP and GRF under their nonamputated leg.…”
Section: Dynamic Balancing Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations