Saproxylic beetles depend on diverse microhabitats that are exploited by different species assemblages. We focused on analysing the functional trait patterns and functional diversity components of two main assemblages that were collected with window traps (Wts) and hollow emergence traps (Hets) respectively, between three protected areas of the iberian peninsula. for that we measured phenological, physiological, morphological, and ecological traits. Results showed that the main microhabitats exploited by each assemblage (Wt and Het) constrain most of the morphological traits and trophic guilds. in addition, relative elytra length and predator guild, together with adult activity period, responded to differences at the habitat level (among study areas). HET assemblages were less taxonomically diverse but more functionally diverse than those of Wts, enhancing the functional relevance of tree hollows. Additionally, niche filtering dominated WT assemblages, which were characterised by a narrower functional space and a higher redundancy. in contrast, in the Het assemblages the coexistence of functionally dissimilar species is driven by the niche heterogeneity. HET and WT assemblages differed in the functional space occupied by each within areas, but both assemblages reflected coincident patterns among areas that pointed to a reduction of functional space with management.Saproxylic beetles are one of the main components of the forest fauna. They are highly diverse and provide important ecosystem services related to nutrient recycling and the decomposition of wood 1,2 ; forest pest control, through the action of saproxylic predators on primary xylophagous beetles (i.e., Scolytinae) 3,4 ; and pollination, as many adult saproxylic beetles are flower visitors. In spite of the functional importance of saproxylic beetle communities, few studies have included a functional trait approach 5-10 , and most have focused on how they respond to environmental change.Saproxylic beetles depend, directly or indirectly, on a number of distinct microhabitats provided by living and dead trees that can host specific assemblages of co-occurring beetle species 1,11 . Moreover, each assemblage is formed by species belonging to different trophic guilds that interact among themselves and with the substrate in different ways 11,12 . Species richness and composition vary between woody microhabitats 6,13,14 ; however, studies focused on the different saproxylic assemblages -understood as a taxonomically related group of species that occur together in space and time 15 -or on their assemblage mechanisms are scarce 6 .The most commonly used method for studying saproxylic beetles is flight intercept traps, such as window traps (WTs), which collect a species assemblage representing a broad set of ecologies 6 . WTs primarily catch flying adults arriving from several tree microhabitats (e.g., decaying branches, bark, or tree hollows) but also from other woody resources within the woodland environment, such as dead wood on the ground (e.g., snags, logs) [1...