Influence of trough versus pasture feeding on average daily gain and carcass characteristics in ruminants: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Quantitative meta-analysis was run on 108 publications featuring 116 experiments and 399 treatments dealing with the effect of trough or pasture feeding environment (FE) on ruminant performances. The objective was to compare the effect of trough or pasture FE on ADG, diet OM digestibility (OMD), various carcass characteristics, and the interaction between FE and complementation modalities. Live weight was adjusted to compare results between species. Results showed that trough-fed animals had higher ADG (+17.89%; P < 0.001), hot carcass yield (HYield; + 2.47%; P < 0.001) and carcass fat content (+ 24.87%; P < 0.001) than pasture-fed animals but lower carcass muscle and bone percentages (-1.60% [P = 0.010] and -7.63% [P = 0.003], respectively). Feeding environment had no effect on diet OMD (P = 0.818), but the number of observations was low. After considering the addition or not of concentrate in the diet (addiCO), FE effect persisted on ADG (P = 0.024) and carcass fat content (P = 0.027) but not on HYield (P = 0.078) or muscle and bone percentages (P = 0.119 and P = 0.581, respectively). After considering the nature of the concentrate (natCO), FE effect persisted on ADG (P < 0.001) and HYield (P = 0.004). Considering the percentage of concentrate in the diet (PCO) erased FE effect on ADG (P = 0.891) and HYield (P = 0.128). In contrast, considering the quantity of concentrate(QCO) erased FE effect on ADG (P = 0.084) but not on HYield (P = 0.006) or on carcass fat and muscle contents (P = 0.040 and P = 0.040, respectively) although the FE effect on carcass bone content persisted (P = 0.550). Animal species and physiological stage had no effect on any of the variables studied (P > 0.05) but experiment did (P ≤ 0.001). The increase in ADG was positively correlated to HYield in cattle (P = 0.002) and small ruminants (P = 0.003) and positively linked to carcass fat content (P = 0.007) but not carcass muscle content, which actually decreased (P = 0.001). Overall, this meta-analysis confirmed previous reports of FE effects and revealed how the differences generally reported result from a confounding effect of FE and nature of the diet. Indeed, in most of the studies used, trough-fed animals were supplemented with concentrate whereas pasture-fed animals were not. This research also highlighted the fact that pasture-fed animals have the potential to achieve the same performances as trough-fed animals when fed a similar diet.

A meta-analysis of nutrient intake, feed efficiency and performance in cattle grazing on tropical grasslands

“…Concentrate intake had a positive effect on ADG per animal or per ha, with a maximum of 3.5 g/kg BW of ADG, consistent with values published by other authors investigating tropical contexts (Leng, 1990;Poppi and McLennan, 1995;Dixon and Egan, 2000). More recently, a meta-analysis including studies comparing feeding in stalls and at pasture (Agastin et al, 2014) showed that CI is related to ADG (slope of 0.13), which is very similar to the slope calculated in the present study from a different set of published data. The concentrate intake effect on DDMI was also measured, and the calculated substitution rate (i.e.…”

Performances de croissance et efficacité alimentaire des bovins au pâturage en conditions tropicales : étude par méta-analyse

“…Le fourrage tassé dans les auges ne nécessite alors pas d'effort important de préhensibilité. Au pâturage il n'en est pas de même car le fourrage est dressé et plus épars, affectant alors la quantité et la qualité de la MS prélevée par bouchée (Prache et Peyraud 1997, Agastin et al 2014. Et dans ces conditions l'ingestion n'est pas forcément liée à la digestibilité.…”

Virtual herding for flexible livestock management – a review

“…Currently no robust viable methods for reducing CH 4 emissions from foraging ruminants exist (Buddle et al 2011). However, research suggests if freeranging cattle are provided a high-quality diet, CH 4 emissions can be reduced (Ricci et al 2014) and pasture-fed ruminants may be able to achieve comparable performance and greater muscle percentage compared with pen-fed ruminants with similar diets (Agastin et al 2014). Therefore, the potential to optimise diet quality of free-ranging cattle by keeping them moving to the highest quality forage on a landscape using VF may offer management that can lower CH 4 emissions from ruminantdominated landscapes worldwide.…”