2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/451351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Turbulent Scalar Mixing Physics on Premixed Flame Propagation

Abstract: The influence of reactive scalar mixing physics on turbulent premixed flame propagation is studied, within the framework of turbulent flame speed modelling, by comparing predictive ability of two algebraic flame speed models: one that includes all relevant physics and the other ignoring dilatation effects on reactive scalar mixing. This study is an extension of a previous work analysing and validating the former model. The latter is obtained by neglecting modelling terms that include dilatation effects: a dire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it seems that the modelling frame work used in this study is able to capture the flame liftoff heights of a range of conditions, dilution levels, jet velocities ranging from 12 to 30 m/s and 500 to 900 m/s in [46] for undiluted hydrogen, without having to change the combustion modelling parameters. The reason for such robust and consistently good behaviour of the combustion model is because of close coupling of the model parameters to the underlying important physical processes controlling the local burning rate as discussed in [46,[65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Influence Of Jet Velocity and Air-dilutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it seems that the modelling frame work used in this study is able to capture the flame liftoff heights of a range of conditions, dilution levels, jet velocities ranging from 12 to 30 m/s and 500 to 900 m/s in [46] for undiluted hydrogen, without having to change the combustion modelling parameters. The reason for such robust and consistently good behaviour of the combustion model is because of close coupling of the model parameters to the underlying important physical processes controlling the local burning rate as discussed in [46,[65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Influence Of Jet Velocity and Air-dilutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested (Kobayashi et al, 1996) that the flame-angle measurements were likely to correspond most nearly to a Reynolds-averaged progress variable of C = 0.5, and based on earlier measurements (Smallwood et al, 1995), the turbulent-flame area at this value was estimated to be 1.2 to 1.5 times that at C = 0.05, this latter value having been suggested (Smallwood et al, 1995) to be a reasonable representation of the leading edge of the turbulent flame. Recent modeling efforts (Kolla et al, 2009(Kolla et al, , 2010Kolla and Swaminathan, 2011) have focused on the motion of this leading edge, which therefore would be a desirable value to select.…”
Section: Turbulent Burning Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are specified to satisfy certain physical aspects of turbulence-flame interaction (Kolla et al, 2009;Kolla and Swaminathan, 2011) and so they cannot be changed arbitrarily. The Karlovitz number is defined as Ka u 0 =s 0…”
Section: Reaction Rate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%