“…It is noteworthy that despite the upshift in [HHb] profile, the amplitude and slopes of the signal (i.e., before and after [HHb] bp ) were the same among conditions (i.e., HYPO, NORM, and HYPER). Previous studies have shown that NIRS-derived slopes during an RI test might be affected by other interventions, such as body posture and metabolic diseases (19,23,56), whereas in the present study, the acute FI O 2 did not have any effect. Considering these results, it could be suggested that the physiological mechanisms underpinning the [HHb] signal responses and, in particular, the occurrence of the [HHb] plateau-like response at the end of the RI test might be similar regardless of the FI O 2 utilized and be driven by the achievement of a common metabolic milieu within the exercising musculature.…”