2021
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2021.3070594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Uncertainty of Body Permittivity on Achievable Radiation Efficiency of Implantable Antennas—Stochastic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper boundary of the relevant low-frequency range may be yet assumed conservatively loosely positioned somewhere in the hundreds kHz range, based on the following considerations: (i) such a 100 kHz boundary is purely conventional, (ii) spectral emissions from some conversion apparatus may be shifted with relevant intensity to the higher frequency, and (iii) there is no abrupt transition of the mechanisms of exposure across the said 100 kHz boundary. Conversely, all the reviewed apparatus and systems are not intentional emitters of radiofrequency e.m. field, as occurs for a wide range of radio and smart devices that are widely diffused and feature a rapid technological evolution, culminating in wearable smart devices and antennas deeply interacting with body electromagnetic characteristics [34] and in the wireless LAN, 4G and 5G systems [35,36]. In this case, the prevalent mechanism of exposure is thermal, but some parameters and tissue characteristics are common to the present low-frequency domain, although to quantify at a higher frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper boundary of the relevant low-frequency range may be yet assumed conservatively loosely positioned somewhere in the hundreds kHz range, based on the following considerations: (i) such a 100 kHz boundary is purely conventional, (ii) spectral emissions from some conversion apparatus may be shifted with relevant intensity to the higher frequency, and (iii) there is no abrupt transition of the mechanisms of exposure across the said 100 kHz boundary. Conversely, all the reviewed apparatus and systems are not intentional emitters of radiofrequency e.m. field, as occurs for a wide range of radio and smart devices that are widely diffused and feature a rapid technological evolution, culminating in wearable smart devices and antennas deeply interacting with body electromagnetic characteristics [34] and in the wireless LAN, 4G and 5G systems [35,36]. In this case, the prevalent mechanism of exposure is thermal, but some parameters and tissue characteristics are common to the present low-frequency domain, although to quantify at a higher frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%