2013
DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2013.e6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of underwater light climate on periphyton and phytoplankton communities in shallow lakes from the Pampa plain (Argentina) with contrasting steady states

Abstract: Shallow lakes from the Pampa plain (Argentina)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, earthen fish ponds can provide a more suitable environment for the development of a benthic community which, in turn, has been found to increase the fish yield, particularly in fish polycultures (Azim et al 2002). The concentration of Chl a in the phytobenthos was considerably higher than that reported for natural shallow lakes in the Pampa plains (Sánchez et al 2013) though it was comparable to values measured in fertilized experimental fish ponds with a similar number of benthic taxa (Azim et al 2002). Macrophytes and phytobenthos are usually neglected in aquaculture production unless management is oriented to promote other ecosystem services in coastal waters such as protection against tidal surges (Sequeira et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, earthen fish ponds can provide a more suitable environment for the development of a benthic community which, in turn, has been found to increase the fish yield, particularly in fish polycultures (Azim et al 2002). The concentration of Chl a in the phytobenthos was considerably higher than that reported for natural shallow lakes in the Pampa plains (Sánchez et al 2013) though it was comparable to values measured in fertilized experimental fish ponds with a similar number of benthic taxa (Azim et al 2002). Macrophytes and phytobenthos are usually neglected in aquaculture production unless management is oriented to promote other ecosystem services in coastal waters such as protection against tidal surges (Sequeira et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The dominance of diatoms would be the expected outcome of both phytoplanktonic and phytobenthic assemblages in shallow inorganic-turbid lakes (Sánchez et al 2013), but the study site encompassed a wide fluctuation of the underwater light climate with clearwater, inorganic-turbid and phytoplankton-turbid phases where chlorophytes and haptophytes clearly dominated over diatoms in the phytoplankton. As demonstrated by Flöder and Burns (2005), species coexistence is promoted in light-fluctuating environments when the phytoplankton also competes for the uptake of a nutrient, such as DIP in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton and periphyton occupy different habitats, however compete for the same resources (light, nutrients) (Havens et al, 1996). Cyanobacteria blooms, for example, can reduce light availability to the periphyton, but the algae of this community can also show adaptations to shade (e. g. changes in pigments concentrations) (Borduqui & Ferragut, 2012;Sánchez et al, 2013). On the other hand, periphyton can assimilate and retain nutrients of water column and obtain dissolved nutrients from living substrates, such as macrophytes (Vadeboncoeur & Steinman, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In well-developed biofilm (i.e., many layers of cells), only algae cells near the biofilm-water interface may experience photoinhibition, while cells in the layers below remain protected (Sand-Jensen & Revsbech 1987;. Biofilm in freshwater ecosystems may regularly experience irradiance values that may cause photoinhibition due to daily (DeNicola et al 1992) and seasonal (Hill & Dimick 2002) variation, however, natural biofilms can produce protective accessory pigments, like carotenoids, that facilitate their adaptation to changing light environments (Laviale et al 2009;Sánchez et al 2013) and, therefore, the relationship between light and biofilm biomass is typically positive.…”
Section: Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%