2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-010-0233-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of using texture information in remote sensed data on the accuracy of forest type classification at different levels of spatial resolution

Abstract: We evaluated the influence of texture information from remote sensed data on the accuracy of forest type classification at different spatial resolutions. We used 4-m spatial resolution imagery to create five different sets of imagery with lower spatial resolutions down to 30 m. We classified forest type using spectral information alone, texture information alone, and spectral and texture information combined at each spatial resolution, and compared the classification accuracy at each resolution. The classifica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Ota et al [65] found that the addition of textural information improved the discrimination of hinoki cypress and cool-temperate mixed forest whereas no improvement for Japanese cedar and a clear cut area was observed. Franklin [66] also documented that the addition of texture generally improved the classification accuracy of hardwood stands, more so than for softwood stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Ota et al [65] found that the addition of textural information improved the discrimination of hinoki cypress and cool-temperate mixed forest whereas no improvement for Japanese cedar and a clear cut area was observed. Franklin [66] also documented that the addition of texture generally improved the classification accuracy of hardwood stands, more so than for softwood stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In almost every case the number of derivative layers included in the image stacks exceeded the number of original VNIR bands. The utility of added dimensionality through the inclusion of layers derived from the standard VNIR bands is generally supported by common use with decision tree classifiers (Goetz, Wright, Smith, Zinecker, & Schaub, 2003;Kayitakire, Hamel, & Defourny, 2006;Lu & Weng, 2007;Ota, Mizoue, & Yoshida, 2011;Thenkabail, Enclona, Ashton, Legg, & De Dieu, 2004). It could be expected the usefulness of additional attribute layers is dependent on both land cover and data characteristics, and research has shown that gain in accuracy from adding feature layers may reach a point of diminishing return, particularly where there is a high level of co-variation among the added features (Lu & Weng, 2007;Pal & Mather, 2003).…”
Section: Reference Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, a combination of different window sizes, such as those used for the feature set TextureAll, turned out to have an improvement on the accuracy results (GE1 experiment). Hence, similar to [30]- [32], the local texture indices were the only feature that led to a significant increase in the accuracy and, therefore, the feature set TextureAll was applied to both VHRsatellite orthoimages in order to obtain the corresponding ISA classification.…”
Section: A Ge1 and Wv2 Feature Set Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%