2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocom.2022.e00662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vacancies on the temperature-dependent magnetism of bulk Fe: A spin-lattice dynamics approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fe foams show a slight decrease of the Curie temperature and a significant increase of the critical exponent β with increasing surface atom fraction, n surf . These findings are in quali-tative agreement with previous results for vacancy-filled Fe crystals [25] and with novel data on void-filled crystals. The agreement is even quantitatively satisfactory for the Curie temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fe foams show a slight decrease of the Curie temperature and a significant increase of the critical exponent β with increasing surface atom fraction, n surf . These findings are in quali-tative agreement with previous results for vacancy-filled Fe crystals [25] and with novel data on void-filled crystals. The agreement is even quantitatively satisfactory for the Curie temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While the Curie temperature is lowered slightly with increasing n surf , the critical exponent rises significantly to up to 1.4 times the predicted literature value for bulk Fe [31], β = 0.33. These results are qualitatively in line with previous results for defective Fe samples with vacancies by Meyer et al [25].…”
Section: A Temperature Dependencesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work we fit Eq. (3) to data by Ma et al [44], as it was already done in previous works [34,45]. Specifically, we use the following values: α = 96.0 meV, γ = 0.20, δ = 0.154 nm.…”
Section: A Sld Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%