2009
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00168.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Vagotomy on Monosynaptic Transmission at Second-Order Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Synapses

Abstract: Swartz JB, Weinreich D. Influence of vagotomy on monosynaptic transmission at second-order nucleus tractus solitarius synapses. J Neurophysiol 102: 2846 -2855, 2009. First published September 2, 2009 doi:10.1152/jn.00168.2009. Manipulations of vagal activity are used to treat medical pathologies, but the underlying CNS changes caused by these treatments are not well understood. Furthermore, heart and lung transplant as well as treatments for many gastrointestinal disorders result in section of the vagus nerve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that the number of synapses within the NTS at 60 days post vagotomy did not significantly differ from controls, suggesting that central vagal synaptic connections were largely restored. Previous results suggest that unilateral cervical vagotomy causes a decrease in synaptic efficacy by both increasing the overall percentage of synaptic failures and shifting the population of NTS synapses toward a more high failure transmission (Swartz and Weinreich, ). This study combined recordings from across animals 6–30 days post vagotomy, a time period we now appreciate exhibits dynamic changes in afferent death and synaptic withdrawal/reinnervation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show that the number of synapses within the NTS at 60 days post vagotomy did not significantly differ from controls, suggesting that central vagal synaptic connections were largely restored. Previous results suggest that unilateral cervical vagotomy causes a decrease in synaptic efficacy by both increasing the overall percentage of synaptic failures and shifting the population of NTS synapses toward a more high failure transmission (Swartz and Weinreich, ). This study combined recordings from across animals 6–30 days post vagotomy, a time period we now appreciate exhibits dynamic changes in afferent death and synaptic withdrawal/reinnervation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are consistent with this report in that synaptic strength is diminished primarily via a decrease in a presynaptic release probability although we did not observe the dramatic increase in failures. This was likely because we unintentionally masked this effect by increasing the release probability through recording in a 2‐mM bath calcium, whereas Swartz and Weinreich () recorded in a 1‐mM bath calcium. Furthermore, our lesion targeted the subdiaphragmatic abdominal afferents, which provide a dominant innervation into the medial NTS, resulting in a somewhat less “traumatic” injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Signal processing at synapses in the NTS, which incorporates activity in local circuits and upstream efferent signals, determines the output of sensory information from the lungs and airways to all downstream synapses in the refl ex pathways, including higher brain regions. 38,39 Anatomic afferent input from the NTS to the thalamus has been documented in rats, 40 and in monkeys the thalamus is activated by vagus nerve afferents. 41 In cats and rats, stimulation of the cervical vagus nerves results in activation of the somatosensory cortex 42 and insular cortex.…”
Section: Chemoreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 The pathophysiology is characterized by an imbalance in the autonomic control of the cardiovascular system, with a predominance of sympathetic nervous systems and inhibition of parasympathetic nervous systems. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 This imbalance promotes the activation of renin–angiotensin system and mechanisms associated with myocardial remodeling, which worse the disease prognosis and increases patient mortality rates. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%