2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3156-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of varying shape and depth on the generation of tidal bores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the many mechanisms and conditions that affect the process of tidal bore formation, the more relevant are (i) the rate of tidal level rise (e.g., Bonneton et al, 2016;Chanson, 2011b), (ii) the characteristics of the incoming flow, typically flow depth and velocity (e.g., Cai et al, 2014;Filippini et al, 2018), (iii) the funneling shape of the estuary that deforms the tidal wave by steepening the rising limb, hence enhancing the rate of level rise (e.g., Friedrichs & Aubrey, 1994;Lanzoni & Seminara, 1998;Savenije, 2012;Toffolon et al, 2006), (iv) the channel bed profile that also affects the characteristics of the propagating tidal wave (e.g., Cai et al, 2012;Savenije et al, 2008;Shi et al, 2014), and (v) the irregular shape of cross sections, which may introduce additional dissipative processes, alter the wave celerity, and produce reflections and/or distortions of the bore front (e.g., Bonneton et al, 2011;Pan et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2014;Treske, 1994).…”
Section: The Idealized Framework Adopted In the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the many mechanisms and conditions that affect the process of tidal bore formation, the more relevant are (i) the rate of tidal level rise (e.g., Bonneton et al, 2016;Chanson, 2011b), (ii) the characteristics of the incoming flow, typically flow depth and velocity (e.g., Cai et al, 2014;Filippini et al, 2018), (iii) the funneling shape of the estuary that deforms the tidal wave by steepening the rising limb, hence enhancing the rate of level rise (e.g., Friedrichs & Aubrey, 1994;Lanzoni & Seminara, 1998;Savenije, 2012;Toffolon et al, 2006), (iv) the channel bed profile that also affects the characteristics of the propagating tidal wave (e.g., Cai et al, 2012;Savenije et al, 2008;Shi et al, 2014), and (v) the irregular shape of cross sections, which may introduce additional dissipative processes, alter the wave celerity, and produce reflections and/or distortions of the bore front (e.g., Bonneton et al, 2011;Pan et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2014;Treske, 1994).…”
Section: The Idealized Framework Adopted In the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The swell produced by the tide grows and its front steepens as the flooding tide advances inland promoting the formation of a sharp front wave, that is, the tidal bore. Freshwater river flow velocity and depth, as well as bed slope and friction, also affect the process (Bartsch-Winkler & Lynch, 1988;Chanson, 2011a;Shi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bore development is closely linked with the tidal range and the boundary conditions of river mouth. Shi et al [1] investigated how the slope of tidal bores fronts varied with changes in estuariy channel morphology. They found that decreases in channel width and depth promoted the generation of tidal bores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers have all undergone a full peer-review process as regular journal submissions and, finally, we are happy to present this special issue consisting of ten papers. This special issue widens the already existing journal focus on shallow water models and their applications, see, for example, Delfs et al (2013), Shi et al (2014), Carbajal et al (2014) or Huang et al (2014.This special issue starts with two contributions dealing with floods. Beisiegel and Behrens (2015) have developed a robust discontinuous Galerkin (DG) model using special basis functions and a slope limiter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%