2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vascular porosity on fluid flow and nutrient transport in loaded cortical bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These considerations concerning the plots in figures 6 and 7 suggest a PV permeability greater than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little lower than 10 −8 m 2 . Our interpretation of results presented in a recent paper by Goulet et al (2008) reinforces the point made at the end of the previous paragraph concerning a PV permeability greater than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little lower than 10 −8 m 2 . In that work a finite element model whose geometry was generated from a quantitative computed tomography scan of a section of human tibia was employed.…”
Section: Poroelastic Model Of the Pv Level In Bone Tissuesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These considerations concerning the plots in figures 6 and 7 suggest a PV permeability greater than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little lower than 10 −8 m 2 . Our interpretation of results presented in a recent paper by Goulet et al (2008) reinforces the point made at the end of the previous paragraph concerning a PV permeability greater than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little lower than 10 −8 m 2 . In that work a finite element model whose geometry was generated from a quantitative computed tomography scan of a section of human tibia was employed.…”
Section: Poroelastic Model Of the Pv Level In Bone Tissuesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As we began work on this paper we thought that a PV permeability of 10 −14 m 2 was possible. Our original version of the figure that is now figure 6 employed a PV permeability of 10 −14 m 2 and our results were similar to those of Goulet et al (2008) in predicting an unrealistically high pore pressure in the PV. It is the analysis of the last paragraph that changed our minds.…”
Section: Poroelastic Model Of the Pv Level In Bone Tissuesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These considerations concerning the plots in Figures 9.11 and 9.12 suggest a PV permeability lower than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little greater than 10 −8 m 2 . The interpretation in [91] of results presented in a recent paper [95] reinforces the point made at the end of the previous paragraph concerning a PV permeability lower than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little greater than 10 −8 m 2 . In [95], a finite element model whose geometry was generated from a quantitatively computed tomography scan of a section of human tibia was employed.…”
Section: Interchange Of Interstitial Fluid Between the Vascular And Lsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The interpretation in [91] of results presented in a recent paper [95] reinforces the point made at the end of the previous paragraph concerning a PV permeability lower than 10 −9 m 2 and perhaps a little greater than 10 −8 m 2 . In [95], a finite element model whose geometry was generated from a quantitatively computed tomography scan of a section of human tibia was employed. The fluid velocities and the pore fluid pressure in the PLC and in the PLC + PV were calculated for .13 A plot of the pore pressure due to blood pressure in the PV, p V (β, t), as a function of the dimensionless radial coordinate of the model bone b at various temporal points in the cyclic oscillation.…”
Section: Interchange Of Interstitial Fluid Between the Vascular And Lsupporting
confidence: 86%