2017
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vegetation type and prescribed fire onPeromyscusabundance in a longleaf pine ecosystem

Abstract: Prescribed fire temporarily can alter food and cover resources for ground-dwelling wildlife, potentially leading to changes in animal abundance. Small mammals are an important ecosystem component in many terrestrial communities and depend on ground-level vegetation most commonly affected by prescribed fire. In this complex system of food and cover availability where easier access to food might compromise cover, and vice versa, it is imperative to study postfire habitat use by mice and other grounddwelling wild… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No evidence was discovered that would lead us to believe that vertebrate seed predators breached the exclosures. Further, we did not capture any small mammals, a result that is consistent with Sasmal et al (), who determined that small mammal abundance was extremely low in frequently burned longleaf pine communities. This result, combined with our observations of ants and millipedes consuming seeds, leads us to believe that invertebrate seed predators were the primary seed predator in excluded plots and likely contributed to seed depredation in all plots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…No evidence was discovered that would lead us to believe that vertebrate seed predators breached the exclosures. Further, we did not capture any small mammals, a result that is consistent with Sasmal et al (), who determined that small mammal abundance was extremely low in frequently burned longleaf pine communities. This result, combined with our observations of ants and millipedes consuming seeds, leads us to believe that invertebrate seed predators were the primary seed predator in excluded plots and likely contributed to seed depredation in all plots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Sasmal et al. ( 2017 ) showed that Peromyscus spp. abundance was greater in drainages than in the frequently burned upland pine forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspect the selection for smaller-seeded species was likely influenced by the local seed predator population. Although seed predator identity was not recorded in this study, small-mammal abundance has been shown to be extremely low in frequently burned pine woodlands (Sasmal et al, 2017), and circumstantial evidence suggests that invertebrates are acting as the primary seed predators at our stand (Willis et al, 2019). Based on this assumption, the low occurrence of Quercus nigra granivory may be explained by the principles of optimal foraging theory, as foraging invertebrates may have avoided acorns due to their thick seed coat or size (Rey et al, 2002;Lichti et al, 2017 One caveat to our interpretation of granivory is the assumption that seed predators are not benefiting tree recruitment through secondary dispersal (Vander Wall et al, 2005).…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 69%