1988
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0840197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of visible light and room temperature on cell proliferation in preimplantation rabbit embryos

Abstract: During in-vitro culture rabbit early cleavage stages (Day 1 p.c.) and compacted morulae (Day 3 p.c.) were exposed to visible light or to room temperature (23 degrees C) for various lengths of time (0.5-24 h). The light source used resembled closely routine laboratory lighting. Controls were cultured simultaneously for 24 h under standard conditions (37 degrees C, darkness). Development was assessed by incorporation of tritiated thymidine as an indicator of cell proliferation. In comparison to non-exposed contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The arrested metaphases deserve special attention. They are not likely to be derived from an increased mitotic activity, because the embryonic growth was almost completely inhibited during culture at room temperature (Chang 1948;Schumacher and Fischer 1988). A specific susceptibility of the spindle apparatus towards reduced temperature seems to be the most likely reason.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrested metaphases deserve special attention. They are not likely to be derived from an increased mitotic activity, because the embryonic growth was almost completely inhibited during culture at room temperature (Chang 1948;Schumacher and Fischer 1988). A specific susceptibility of the spindle apparatus towards reduced temperature seems to be the most likely reason.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have selected the CF-1 mouse for this study because it blocks at the 2-cell stage in all media tested in our laboratory although Dandekar & Glass (1987) Schumacher & Fischer (1988) suggested that as little as 1 h of exposure to light is significantly harmful to Day-1 rabbit embryo development. All solutions, dishes and instruments were maintained at 37°C before use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lighting during embryo manipulation may be harmful for embryo viability, because physiologic brightness during in vivo development is much darker than that during the manipulation (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Such difference may induce stress-related biologic metabolism or activate biologic reactions that lead to embryo mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%