2014
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of void fraction calculation on fidelity of CFD‐DEM simulation of gas‐solid bubbling fluidized beds

Abstract: The correct calculation of cell void fraction is pivotal in accurate simulation of two‐phase flows using a computational fluid dynamics‐discrete element method (CFD‐DEM) approach. Two classical approaches for void fraction calculations (i.e., particle centroid method or PCM and analytical approach) were examined, and the accuracy of these methodologies in predicting the particle‐fluid flow characteristics of bubbling fluidized beds was investigated. It was found that there is a critical cell size (3.82 particl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
111
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that when the particle centroid is located near cell boundaries (e.g., particle P2 in Fig. 1(a)), the error can be up to 50% (Peng et al, 2014). If a cell contains several such particles and if these particles are large compared to the host cell, unphysically large values can occur for this cell, leading to a non-smooth solid particle volume field with large gradients.…”
Section: Particle Centroid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that when the particle centroid is located near cell boundaries (e.g., particle P2 in Fig. 1(a)), the error can be up to 50% (Peng et al, 2014). If a cell contains several such particles and if these particles are large compared to the host cell, unphysically large values can occur for this cell, leading to a non-smooth solid particle volume field with large gradients.…”
Section: Particle Centroid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See text for discussion and Movie S1 for a full animation. Details of the calculation are found in the supporting information [Alizadeh et al, 2014;Coetzee and Els, 2009;Cole and Hopkins, 2016;Costa et al, 2010;Davidson et al, 2001;Li and Guenther, 2012;Nakamura and Watano, 2007;Paulick et al, 2015;Peng et al, 2014;Richter et al, 2003;Ruprecht et al, 2012;Tsuji et al, 1993;Wallace and Bergantz, 2005].…”
Section: Force Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other detailed simulation parameters are listed in Table 4. 42,43 For coarse DEM simulations, the smaller parcel to grid size ratio of 2 allows for a sufficient number of grid cells to resolve the fluid flow since fewer cells are used as parcels become coarser. For CFD-DEM simulations, the CFD grid size is set to 4 d p .…”
Section: Equations Of Motion For Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will reduce the computational cost with little influence on the simulation results since both grid sizes are sufficiently fine to resolve most flow structures. 42,43 For coarse DEM simulations, the smaller parcel to grid size ratio of 2 allows for a sufficient number of grid cells to resolve the fluid flow since fewer cells are used as parcels become coarser.…”
Section: Equations Of Motion For Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%