2009
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/21/214015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of wall roughness on the geometrical, mechanical and transport properties of single fractures

Abstract: This article reviews the main features of the transport properties of single fractures. A particular attention paid to fractures in geological materials which often display a roughness covering a broad range of length scales. Because of the small distance separating the fracture walls, the surface roughness is a key parameter influencing the structure of the void space. Studies devoted to the characterization of the surface roughness are presented as well as works aimed at characterizing the void space geometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the flow occurs over a few tortuous channels, the hydraulic behavior of fracture would be controlled by the small apertures and constrictions [ Tsang and Tsang , ; Neuzil and Tracy , ]. The structure of the aperture field is strongly related to the relative position of the fracture surfaces together with the statistical distribution of the asperities [ Auradou , ]. Due to the roughness of the fracture surfaces, the shear displacement is accompanied with two main features including dilation and lateral mismatching of surfaces [ Esaki et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the flow occurs over a few tortuous channels, the hydraulic behavior of fracture would be controlled by the small apertures and constrictions [ Tsang and Tsang , ; Neuzil and Tracy , ]. The structure of the aperture field is strongly related to the relative position of the fracture surfaces together with the statistical distribution of the asperities [ Auradou , ]. Due to the roughness of the fracture surfaces, the shear displacement is accompanied with two main features including dilation and lateral mismatching of surfaces [ Esaki et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologic fractures, however, are always under significant overburden stress. While confining stress has been shown to impact fluid flow through rough-walled fractures in a fundamental way (e.g., Unger & Mase, 1993;Olsson & Brown, 1993;Pyrak-Nolte & Morris, 2000;Watanabe et al, 2008;Auradou, 2009;Nemoto et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2013;Ishibashi et al, 2015;Pyrak-Nolte & Nolte, 2016), studies of anomalous transport at the scale of individual fractures have so far either ignored the potential role of confining stress (Måløy et al, 1988;Detwiler et al, 2000;Auradou et al, 2001;Bodin et al, 2003a;Drazer et al, 2004;Talon et al, 2012;Wang & Cardenas, 2014), relied on nonmechanistic models (Tsang & Tsang, 1987), or focused on the role of shear stress (Koyama et al, 2008;Vilarrasa et al, 2011;Jing et al, 2013). As a result, the mechanistic underpinning and theoretical modeling for the emergence of anomalous transport in rough fractures under normal stress remains unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the roughness in natural fractures is extremely complex, many experimental studies [23,24] have shown that the roughness surface in natural fractures follows self-affine fractal statistics. Due to the flexibility for solving problems with geometrically complex boundaries, the LBM is naturally suitable for simulating the fluid flow in a self-affine fracture [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%