1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00397084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of water circulation rate on in situ measurements of benthic community respiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our cores were unstirred because we deemed potential stirring effects on respiration to be slight, while the potential overestimation of nutrient fluxes could be substantial. Stirring can stimulate aerobic respiration by removal of low oxygen tensions (Boynton et al 1981). However, oxygen concentration changes in our experiments were small (f 2 mg 1-') and final oxygen concentrations were relatively high, 2 5 mg 1-' (vs 23.0 in Boynton et al 1981).…”
Section: Samplingcontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our cores were unstirred because we deemed potential stirring effects on respiration to be slight, while the potential overestimation of nutrient fluxes could be substantial. Stirring can stimulate aerobic respiration by removal of low oxygen tensions (Boynton et al 1981). However, oxygen concentration changes in our experiments were small (f 2 mg 1-') and final oxygen concentrations were relatively high, 2 5 mg 1-' (vs 23.0 in Boynton et al 1981).…”
Section: Samplingcontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Stirring can stimulate aerobic respiration by removal of low oxygen tensions (Boynton et al 1981). However, oxygen concentration changes in our experiments were small (f 2 mg 1-') and final oxygen concentrations were relatively high, 2 5 mg 1-' (vs 23.0 in Boynton et al 1981). Since oxygen tensions were never low stirring effects on respiration would probably have been minimal.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The apparent diffusion coefficients were about 5 times the molecular diffusion coefficient (Broeker and Peng, 1982). Similar differences between Da and molecular diffusion coefficients have been observed by other researchers in both artificial and marine sediments, and the difference may be due to advection of headspace water through the sediments by stirring, irregular surface charactenstics, and variations in effective sediment porosity (Boynton, 1981;Güss, 1998). The higher Da in the artificial sediment may be due to the absence of the layer of fine organic material at the sediment surface found in sandy and muddy sediments which would have facilitated advection of headspace water through the sediments.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 84%