2018
DOI: 10.18805/ijar.b-3546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of weaning on growth, health and behaviour of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves

Abstract: Present investigation was carried out to determine the effect of calf weaning and natural suckling on the growth performance, immune status, health and behaviour of buffalo calves. Sixteen newly born calves (8 calves from weaned group and 8 calves from natural suckling group) were raised in two separate groups under loose housing system. The mean daily colostrum intake during first two days was higher in suckled calves as compared to weaned calves. The average daily body weight gain was significantly higher (0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in daily milk intake might be due to better digestion of milk due to more mixing of salivary enzymes with milk and also due to realization of natural drinking behaviour under suckling system. The results obtained in the present study are in agreement with the finding of Singh et al (2019) who revealed that the mean squares value of milk intake from sixth day after birth to 12 weeks of age in suckled calves were significantly higher (P<0.01) as compared to weaned buffalo calves. Mendoza et al (2010) who reported that Holstein calves managed under restricted suckling system (7.2 kg/day) had a higher (p<0.001) average milk intake than calves under artificial rearing (5.4 kg/day).…”
Section: Milk Intake (Kg/day) By Calvessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference in daily milk intake might be due to better digestion of milk due to more mixing of salivary enzymes with milk and also due to realization of natural drinking behaviour under suckling system. The results obtained in the present study are in agreement with the finding of Singh et al (2019) who revealed that the mean squares value of milk intake from sixth day after birth to 12 weeks of age in suckled calves were significantly higher (P<0.01) as compared to weaned buffalo calves. Mendoza et al (2010) who reported that Holstein calves managed under restricted suckling system (7.2 kg/day) had a higher (p<0.001) average milk intake than calves under artificial rearing (5.4 kg/day).…”
Section: Milk Intake (Kg/day) By Calvessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The artificial rearing or weaning of calves has been found to be adversely affecting the growth and health of calves (Singh et al, 2019) due to large number of factors particularly in tropics. In weaning system of rearing calves can show a distinctive distress response both when they are separated from the cow, and later when they are weaned from milk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that the simple act of allowing calves to ingest their dams’ milk for a period of 90 days (one month more than is normally allowed in production units in Mexico’s tropical wetlands) positively impacts weight gain (0.506 vs. 0.438 kg/day). In addition, allowing calves to suckle reduces the time spent on crossed suckling and licking themselves and other objects, compared to calves that are weaned immediately after birth [ 76 ] ( Figure 7 ).…”
Section: Colostrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most mammals, care for the young depends primarily on the mother (Zilkha et al, 2016). Rearing of calf after birth may have a significant impact on the subsequent performance and behaviour of animals and keeping the calf together with the mother in buffalo production systems could have a good outcome on calf growth without compromising milk production (Singh et al, 2019). Proper rearing of a healthy and viable calf is another prerequisite for making the best use of its genetic potential for dairy animals (Frelich et al, 2008 andRehak et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%