2015
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2015.1039550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of wheel–rail contact modelling on vehicle dynamic simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) In previous comparative studies [27][28][29][30], the normal modeling used simplified contact models, namely, KP, Linder, STRIPES, and ANALYN. Their normal results were only similar to the exact solution and then the inaccurate traction bound (the product of normal pressure and friction coefficient) could affect the prediction of stick-slip division and tangential stress distribution in tangential modeling.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(i) In previous comparative studies [27][28][29][30], the normal modeling used simplified contact models, namely, KP, Linder, STRIPES, and ANALYN. Their normal results were only similar to the exact solution and then the inaccurate traction bound (the product of normal pressure and friction coefficient) could affect the prediction of stick-slip division and tangential stress distribution in tangential modeling.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of these three approaches is modifying the flexibility parameters used in FASTSIM by equivalent ellipse [24] or local ellipse [25,26] to replace the original ones derived from elliptic shape. The tangential performance of these three approaches for nonelliptic contact cases was compared and verified by [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The precision of the models for the study of the lateral dynamic behaviour of the railway vehicle depends a great deal on the modelling of the vehicle-track interaction conditions [14], which proves difficult due to the nonlinearity of the wheel-rail contact -of a geometric, elastic (the normal issue of the contact) and tribological (the tangential issue of the contact) nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some novel virtual penetration based methods include Kik-Piotrowski's method [30], Linder's method [31] and Stripes method [32]. Burgelman has compared the results of these methods and the elliptical based method FASTSIM and has concluded that the non-elliptical models predict a better curving behaviour with 12% lower creepages and 3% lower creep force than the FASTSIM elliptical model; however, the difference on straight tracks is negligible [33].…”
Section: Review Of Wheel-rail Contact Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%