2022
DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2022.2083710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of wheelset rotational motion on train collision response and wheelset lift mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bogie frame includes the end beam, side beam, cross beam, and other parts, which mainly support the car body and the acceleration and braking of the train [19]. The wheelset is the only part of the vehicle that has contact with the track and is a very key part as the stress point of the train [20]. The wheelbase is 1353 ± 2 mm and the wheel diameter value running range is 770 mm to 840 mm.…”
Section: Standards and Requirements For Key Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bogie frame includes the end beam, side beam, cross beam, and other parts, which mainly support the car body and the acceleration and braking of the train [19]. The wheelset is the only part of the vehicle that has contact with the track and is a very key part as the stress point of the train [20]. The wheelbase is 1353 ± 2 mm and the wheel diameter value running range is 770 mm to 840 mm.…”
Section: Standards and Requirements For Key Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, train collisions are diverse and most existing standards are set for frontal collisions without any requirements for side collisions and collision scenarios between trains and other trackside buildings. 2,3 Current research on train collisions is primarily focused on the collision dynamics theory, [4][5][6][7][8] numerical collision simulation techniques, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] collision energy management, [17][18][19][20] and tests. 21,22 In terms of train collision simulation modelling, compared with testing, multi-body dynamics theory and finite element numerical simulation have become commonly adopted methods for designing and verifying the crashworthiness of vehicle structures owing to their advantages of economy, convenience, operability, short cycle time, and repeatability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%