1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2991(97)80764-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of zeolite pore structure on catalytic reactivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details about the simulation will be presented elsewhere (7). It was shown previously that it accurately describes the overall rate of hydroisomerization of n-hexane under a wide range of conditions and on different zeolites (7,8). This validated model is used to accurately simulate the kinetics of a Pt/H-mordenite catalyst as a function of temperature and make a quantitative comparison between experiment and simulation possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Details about the simulation will be presented elsewhere (7). It was shown previously that it accurately describes the overall rate of hydroisomerization of n-hexane under a wide range of conditions and on different zeolites (7,8). This validated model is used to accurately simulate the kinetics of a Pt/H-mordenite catalyst as a function of temperature and make a quantitative comparison between experiment and simulation possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From steady-state experiments we deduced an activation energy of isomerization to iso-hexane of approximately 1354-20 kJ/mol [51]. The protonated, isomerized intermediate remains strongly adsorbed.…”
Section: Position (Mm)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…DFT calculations are increasingly being applied to predict the interactions of adsorbates with catalytic sites [10]. Such DFT methods provided accurate geometries and reasonable energetics for molecules containing transition metals [11][12][13][14] are sufficient to describe the active sites in comparison of the predictions with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%