2016
DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2016.1144836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence on pedestrian commuting behavior of the built environment surrounding destinations: A structural equations modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study examines the associations between the objective neighbourhood characteristics, perceptions of the built environment, walking attitudes and walking frequency for three different activities-work/school, leisure/recreation and household responsibilities-in Shenzhen. The regression analyses demonstrate that the variables associated with walking frequency vary markedly among different types of walking, which is in line with previous studies (Saelens and Handy 2008;Vale and Pereira 2016). More perceived environment variables are found to be associated with walking for leisure/recreation than for household responsibilities and work/school.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study examines the associations between the objective neighbourhood characteristics, perceptions of the built environment, walking attitudes and walking frequency for three different activities-work/school, leisure/recreation and household responsibilities-in Shenzhen. The regression analyses demonstrate that the variables associated with walking frequency vary markedly among different types of walking, which is in line with previous studies (Saelens and Handy 2008;Vale and Pereira 2016). More perceived environment variables are found to be associated with walking for leisure/recreation than for household responsibilities and work/school.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Travel attitudes are usually measured by using factor analysis or carefully validated psychometric scales to capture meaningful constructs from numerous statements to reveal travelers' preferences, fondness and perceptions towards different transport modes, as well as intention to travel. Travel attitudes have been found to have significant effects on travel behaviour (Kitamura et al 1997;Kamruzzaman et al 2016;Vale and Pereira 2016). For example, Cao et al (2006) identified four types of travel attitudes: pro-bike/walk, travel minimising, safety of cars, and car dependent during their investigation of relationships between built environment and travel behaviour.…”
Section: Attitudes and Walking Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the built environment can be described as the 5Ds (Cervero & Kockelman, 1997;Cervero, Sarmiento, Jacoby, Gomez, & Neiman, 2009;Ewing & Cervero, 2010), better defined as "3Ds+A", i.e., Density, Diversity, Design and Accessibility, the last normally identified as Destination Accessibility and Distance to transit (Vale & Pereira, 2016). However, the focus of the majority of studies is on the characteristics of origins (the location of the home) and they neglect the influence that the destination might have on travel, despite the already demonstrated importance of destinations in explaining travel.…”
Section: Different Destination Different Commuting Pattern? Analyzinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the focus of the majority of studies is on the characteristics of origins (the location of the home) and they neglect the influence that the destination might have on travel, despite the already demonstrated importance of destinations in explaining travel. Indeed, the built environment of destinations has been pointed out as more important than the built environment of origins in explaining mobility patterns for several travel modes (Forsyth, Hearst, Oakes, & Schmitz, 2008;McNeil, 2011;Millward, Spinney, & Scott, 2013;Vale & Pereira, 2016), especially if the destination is a regular, consistent destination such as the workplace (Chatman, 2003). Even for active travel, this influence still holds (Manaugh & El-Geneidy, 2011), as although the home to work distance is the major barrier to active commuting, the workplace is an origin for several other daily trips (Dong, Ma, & Broach, 2015), and its built environment features might impede or encourage the making of these trips by walking or cycling (Adams, Bull, & Foster, 2016).…”
Section: Different Destination Different Commuting Pattern? Analyzinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking is one of the most basic and sustainable modes of transport, and has several social, individual and environmental benefits attached to it, that include social equity, health and wellness, reduced greenhouse emission, etc. (Vale, Pereira 2016). Increasing awareness of these benefits of walking has generated interest in recognizing built environment factors that facilitate walking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%