2003
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2003.tb01811.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence Strategies in the Supervisory Dyad: An Investigation Into the Effects of Gender and Age

Abstract: A content analysis of audiotapes from 42 counseling supervisory dyads examined the effects of supervisor and supervisee gender on the influence strategies used in the session. Gender of the supervisor was not related to influence strategy. Supervisors of both genders were significantly more likely to accept or build upon the ideas generated by female supervisees and asked for more opinions from male supervisees. Male supervisees gave significantly more suggestions than did female supervtsees, and female superv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may illustrate trainees' frustration and dissatisfaction with their supervisor in these instances and demonstrate the supervisors' influence on the trainees' learning experience. This supports the notion of supervisors' responsibility for involvement in and facilitation of multicultural discussion and learning granello, 2003;Leong & Wagner, 1994). Because of power differentials in supervision, it is important for supervisors to be aware of the impact they are having in the group process and assess this throughout the group supervision experience.…”
Section: Hindering Multicultural Eventsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This may illustrate trainees' frustration and dissatisfaction with their supervisor in these instances and demonstrate the supervisors' influence on the trainees' learning experience. This supports the notion of supervisors' responsibility for involvement in and facilitation of multicultural discussion and learning granello, 2003;Leong & Wagner, 1994). Because of power differentials in supervision, it is important for supervisors to be aware of the impact they are having in the group process and assess this throughout the group supervision experience.…”
Section: Hindering Multicultural Eventsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Like race, gender is a visible difference that has received comparable attention in the supervision literature. For instance, discussions of gender issues have looked at differences in male and female supervisor and supervisee voices, the sharing and awarding of power, the implications of gender matching in supervision (Barnes & Bernard, 2003), gender bias in supervision (Chung, Marshall, & Gordon, 2001;Granello, 2003), and feminist supervision practices (Szymanski, 2005). The fairly high proportion of gender discussions in this study suggests that it continues to remain one of the most addressed topics for supervisees.…”
Section: Content Of Cultural Topics Discussedmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Also there may be differences due to gender within the supervisory context, especially the effects of same-sex or opposite-sex supervisory dyads (Granello, 2003;Granello, Beamish, & Davis, 1997). Furthermore, a future study that included supervisee/supervisor interviews and focus groups would complement and provide more insight into the findings reported in the current study.…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Age differences between supervisor and supervisee have been found to affect supervisee work attitudes and commitment (Cleveland & Shore, 1992), performance ratings of supervisees by supervisors (Vecchio, 1993), ratings of satisfaction with supervision by supervisees (Liden, Stilwell, & Ferris, 1996), and supervisee motivation (Perry, Kulik, & Zhou, 1999). Granello (2003) investigated the effects of age on influence strategies used in supervisory sessions in a sample of 42 counseling supervisory dyads, and found differences between older and younger supervisees. These findings raise questions regarding how satisfaction with supervision and self-efficacy levels vary with supervisee age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%