2012
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of Anisotropic Stretching of Boundary Conforming Grid on Traveltime Computation by Topography‐Dependent Eikonal Equation

Abstract: The classical eikonal equation is commonly used in Cartesian coordinate system for problems that involve static correction, prestack migration, earthquake location and seismic tomography, but is less effective for calculating travel times in an earth model that has an irregular surface. We have presented a topographydependent eikonal equation in a curvilinear coordinate system that makes use of the surface boundary grid and map a rectangular grid onto a curved one. Then, we utilized the efficient Lax-Friedrich… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most modern tomographic techniques addressing an irregular surface are based on unstructured grids, which is computationally inefficient in model parameterization and traveltime calculation (Kimmel and Sethian, 1998; Sethian, 1999; Sethian and Vladimirsky, 2000; Rawlinson and Sambridge, 2004a, b; Qian JL et al 2007a, b; Kao CY et al, 2008; Lelièvre et al, 2011). Unlike these techniques, the structured grid‐based schemes usually handle irregular surfaces by using model expansion (Vidale, 1988; Reshef, 1991; Hole, 1992; Ma T and Zhang Z, 2014a, b, 2015) or irregular surface flattening (Haines, 1988; Lan HQ and Zhang ZJ, 2011a, b, 2013a, b; Lan HQ et al, 2012). The former scheme usually employs a stair‐step approximation of the irregular surface or a flat low‐velocity layer covering the surface, which may cause accuracy loss and even distorted images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most modern tomographic techniques addressing an irregular surface are based on unstructured grids, which is computationally inefficient in model parameterization and traveltime calculation (Kimmel and Sethian, 1998; Sethian, 1999; Sethian and Vladimirsky, 2000; Rawlinson and Sambridge, 2004a, b; Qian JL et al 2007a, b; Kao CY et al, 2008; Lelièvre et al, 2011). Unlike these techniques, the structured grid‐based schemes usually handle irregular surfaces by using model expansion (Vidale, 1988; Reshef, 1991; Hole, 1992; Ma T and Zhang Z, 2014a, b, 2015) or irregular surface flattening (Haines, 1988; Lan HQ and Zhang ZJ, 2011a, b, 2013a, b; Lan HQ et al, 2012). The former scheme usually employs a stair‐step approximation of the irregular surface or a flat low‐velocity layer covering the surface, which may cause accuracy loss and even distorted images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%