1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00249.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the responses of sugar maple and trembling aspen to defoliation

Abstract: Impacts of defoliation on the growth and physiology of sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) were examined in ambient and CO # -enriched atmospheres. Saplings were grown for 70 d in controlled environments, wherein CO # mole fractions averaged either 356 µmol mol −" or 645 µmol mol −" , under a PPF of 500 µmol m −# s −" . On day 49 of the study, 50 % of the leaf area was removed from a subset of each species in both CO # environments. Relative growth rate (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have that found CO 2 stimulates resprouting following defoliation (Fajer et al 1991;Wilsey et al 1994Wilsey et al , 1997Pearson and Brooks 1996) and coppicing (Will and Ceulemans 1997), but in these studies, the effect of CO 2 was not greater for clipped than unclipped individuals. In agreement with the current study, Kruger et al (1998) found the CO 2 effect to be greater for defoliated Acer saccharum. Similarly, Hättenschwiler et al (1997) found significant CO2 enhancement in coppiced Quercus ilex stands but no enhancement after the stands had matured.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Other studies have that found CO 2 stimulates resprouting following defoliation (Fajer et al 1991;Wilsey et al 1994Wilsey et al , 1997Pearson and Brooks 1996) and coppicing (Will and Ceulemans 1997), but in these studies, the effect of CO 2 was not greater for clipped than unclipped individuals. In agreement with the current study, Kruger et al (1998) found the CO 2 effect to be greater for defoliated Acer saccharum. Similarly, Hättenschwiler et al (1997) found significant CO2 enhancement in coppiced Quercus ilex stands but no enhancement after the stands had matured.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…We found that high levels of defoliation decreased individual seedling survival, but low levels had negligible effects. This is consistent with previous reports of sugar maple seedling growth (Ellsworth et al 1994;Kruger et al 1998) and survival (Gardescu 2003). However, we did not find evidence that mortality associated with high defoliation scales up to population-level impacts on total sugar maple seedling biomass or growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We observed no response of R:S ratio to elevated CO 2 . Other studies with aspen and maple, however, have yielded dierent and sometimes con¯icting results for CO 2 eects on R:S ratios (Lindroth et al 1993;Volin and Reich 1996;Kruger et al 1998). With regard to a possible limitation of root sink strength, we observed no evidence of root restriction when roots were harvested.…”
Section: Plant Growth and Phytochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%