1991
DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.11.4.1100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of common variants of apolipoprotein E on measures of lipid metabolism in a sample selected for health.

Abstract: Five-hundred seventy-five white-collar workers (374 men; 99% Caucasians) aged 20-59 years were selected on the basis of their being healthy and clinically free from cardiovascular risk factors (except smoking and family history). We have observed a higher relative frequency of the e 3 allele in this population, as is true of populations with a low prevalence of coronary heart disease. Each of the 11 plasma lipid and lipoprotein traits studied was adjusted for age, weight, height, body mass index, plasma glucos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sing and Davignon [12] first published the observation that the presence of the e2 allele significantly reduced LDL cholesterol and the e4 allele increased it. This was later reported in several other studies [13][14][15][16][17] including an extensive analysis by Schaefer of a larger population stratified by sex and age [18]. There were no studies in Type 1 diabetics that investigated such a large population as that of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sing and Davignon [12] first published the observation that the presence of the e2 allele significantly reduced LDL cholesterol and the e4 allele increased it. This was later reported in several other studies [13][14][15][16][17] including an extensive analysis by Schaefer of a larger population stratified by sex and age [18]. There were no studies in Type 1 diabetics that investigated such a large population as that of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Given that one of the E2/2 subjects was hyperlipidemic (subject #4, Table 1), this subject's distribution is shown separately from the average of the five normolipidemic E2/2 subjects. Compared to the E3/3 subjects, the dyslipidemic E2/2 subject demonstrated an increase in VLDL (in fractions 28-37) particularly in the dense VLDL (VLDL remnants) (in fractions [31][32][33][34][35] and in IDL (in fractions [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In the absence of this dyslipidemic subject, the VLDL and IDL cholesterol distribution of the remaining normolipidemic E2/2 subjects were similar to, but appeared to be slightly higher, than that of the E3/3 subjects (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This transformed variable (lnApoE) was used in this study to accommodate statistical tests that assume normality. We carried out separate analyses of females and males because of the well-documented gender-specific differences in the natural history of the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (Barrett-Connor, 1997;Hayward et al 2000;Matthews et al 1989;Thomas & Braus, 1998;Xhignesse et al 1991). To document such gender specificity in our study, we used Fisher's F-ratio to test whether there was a statistically significant difference in the phenotypic variance of age, height, weight, BMI or lnApoE between females and males (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%