2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of feedstock and plasma spraying parameters on the fabrication of tubular solid oxide fuel cell anodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite involving high‐cost equipment, this method is suitable for mass production. Yang et al 64 studied the influence of feedstock and plasma spraying parameters on the performance of the NiO‐YSZ. The study concluded that the low‐power spraying technique produced an anode with high porosity (40%) but the resultant anode showed a very low conductivity of 4.79 S cm −1 at 800°C.…”
Section: Anode Fabrication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite involving high‐cost equipment, this method is suitable for mass production. Yang et al 64 studied the influence of feedstock and plasma spraying parameters on the performance of the NiO‐YSZ. The study concluded that the low‐power spraying technique produced an anode with high porosity (40%) but the resultant anode showed a very low conductivity of 4.79 S cm −1 at 800°C.…”
Section: Anode Fabrication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…179 Despite involving high-cost equipment, this method is suitable for mass production. Yang et al 64 studied the influence of feedstock and plasma spraying parameters on the performance of the NiO-YSZ. The study concluded that the low-power spraying technique produced an anode with high porosity (40%) but the resultant anode showed a very low conductivity of 4.79 S cm −1 at 800 C. However, Prakash et al 58 reported that Ni/YSZ coating obtained from the plasma spraying method showed an acceptable porosity (30.5%) with an excellent conductivity of 600 S cm −1 at 800 C. In general, physical deposition is a great technique to produce thin films of anode but the required equipment is very expensive.…”
Section: Physical Deposition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two common geometric configurations of SOFCs are planar and tubular designs (7,8). Compared to the planar cells, the tubular SOFCs have simpler sealing requirements (9). The tubular configuration is far more stable, but the planar design offers higher power density (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%