2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2302-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of fit and fill following hip arthroplasty using a cementless short-stem prosthesis

Abstract: Implanting the Metha prosthesis induces tight fit and fill ratio at the proximal and coated sections. Preoperative femur configuration should be considered to achieve best fit and fill situation and therefore excellent primary stability. In most cases "normal" and "stove-pipe" configurations provide good proximal fit and fill. Since "champagne-flute" configuration induces undesirable tight distal fit and fill ratio the size of the Metha (®) stem should be adequately increased to achieve a more proximal load tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study supplements previous studies by showing that magnification of hip radiographs depends not only on marker and patient-specific factors [ 7 , 9 , 10 ], but also on clinical workplace or more precisely on radiographic device. It indicates potential limits in generalizability of results of studies dealing with preoperative planning accuracy to other institutions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study supplements previous studies by showing that magnification of hip radiographs depends not only on marker and patient-specific factors [ 7 , 9 , 10 ], but also on clinical workplace or more precisely on radiographic device. It indicates potential limits in generalizability of results of studies dealing with preoperative planning accuracy to other institutions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The accuracy of templating has been evaluated with respect to the marker type and position [ 4 , 7 , 8 ], template type (acetate vs. digital) [ 3 ], sex, age, body mass index and Harris Hip Score [ 9 11 ]. However, there is limited information whether results from one workplace dealing with certain radiological setup could be quantitatively transferred to another workplace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 According to the canal flare index, the canal shapes were classified as normal (canal flare index ≥3.0–<4.7), stovepipe (canal flare index <3.0), and champagne flute (canal flare index ≥4.7–<6.5). 14,15…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 According to the canal flare index, the canal shapes were classified as normal (canal flare index 3.0-<4.7), stovepipe (canal flare index <3.0), and champagne flute (canal flare index 4.7-<6.5). 14,15 Radiographic loosening of the femoral stem was identified if any of the following symptoms was presented: (1) radiolucent lines more than 2 mm in thickness were detected around the entire implant on the anteroposterior radiograph; 6 (2) serial radiographs showed a progressive stem subsidence of >5 mm; 6 (3) position of the stem progressively changed with varus or valgus tilt of >5 . 7,16…”
Section: Radiographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thereby essential to achieve a cortical metaphyseal anchoring by choosing a sufficiently large prosthesis. 11 , 12 …”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%