2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of limestone particle size distributions and contents on blended cement properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained with the 42.5N cement for the Massinga samples are more similar with the results obtained by Knop et al [10], Bizzozero and Scrivener [11] and Menéndez et al [5], authors that used a 42.5N cement type. The decrease of the compressive strength in the entire interval, reported by Meddah et al [1], contrary to the results of this study and the results obtained by Knop et al [10], Bizzozero and Scrivener [11] and Menéndez et al [5], may be explained by the fact that Meddah et al [1] worked with limestone contents higher than 15%, highest beneficial value reported by the other authors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results obtained with the 42.5N cement for the Massinga samples are more similar with the results obtained by Knop et al [10], Bizzozero and Scrivener [11] and Menéndez et al [5], authors that used a 42.5N cement type. The decrease of the compressive strength in the entire interval, reported by Meddah et al [1], contrary to the results of this study and the results obtained by Knop et al [10], Bizzozero and Scrivener [11] and Menéndez et al [5], may be explained by the fact that Meddah et al [1] worked with limestone contents higher than 15%, highest beneficial value reported by the other authors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Statistical treatment of the results (flexural and compressive strength) of the specimens prepared with the 42.4N cement were all significantly different from the ones obtained with the reference concrete, but fortunately flexural strength results of the samples prepared with all limestone samples (MG1, MG2, SL1, SL2, MS1 and MS2) for all compositions (10,15, 20 and 25% limestone) are higher than flexural strength of the reference sample. On the other side, comparison of the compressive strength gave good results only for the MS2 limestone: Although statistical different, MS2 gave for all compositions (10,15, 20 and 25% limestone) values of the com-pressive strength above the values obtained for the reference material, thus confirming its potential to replace cement in the above mentioned contents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small size of the limestone particles is of high influence on the limestone particles distribution in the cement paste as they tend to agglomerate in the cement powder, lowering the limestone efficiency and hence the hardened cement paste compressive strength [3,4]. Previous studies examined cement pastes with partial substitution of the clinker by limestone with controlled particle size [7][8]. It was found that the surface of the limestone particles influences the hydration rate of the cement paste, as limestone particles increase the nucleation sites for the hydration reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have studied the applicability of waste mineral powder in mortar and concrete production. The addition of marble dust [8,9], basalt powder [10][11][12][13][14][15], limestone powder [14][15][16][17] or granite powder [17,18] or positively affects the strength of cement mortar and concrete as well as durability of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%