2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of low-energy input microwave and ultrasonic pretreatments on single-stage and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of municipal wastewater sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has shown that improved hydrolysis caused by thermal pre-treatment benefits the stability of the digestion process at reduced retention times [38][39][40]. Our results support these findings and clearly show that a higher OLR can be attained with a mild thermal pre-treatment in combination with compartmentalized digestion.…”
Section: Stage #1supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research has shown that improved hydrolysis caused by thermal pre-treatment benefits the stability of the digestion process at reduced retention times [38][39][40]. Our results support these findings and clearly show that a higher OLR can be attained with a mild thermal pre-treatment in combination with compartmentalized digestion.…”
Section: Stage #1supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Such VFAs' concentrations have been associated with imbalances in full-scale processes and suggest that, in this stage, methanogenesis became the rate limiting step. The observed VFAs' values in Stage #3 agree with previously reported values using thermal-phased anaerobic digestion, in which a concentration of 4400 mg VFA/L was reached at a retention time of 7 days [39]. Similarly, an OLR of 8 kg VS/m 3 d (retention time of 4.2 days) caused acidification and interruption of biogas production [41].…”
Section: Stages #2 and #3supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The recovered thermal energy can be used to preheat the sludge, increase its temperature to some extent, and therefore reduce the input energy of the system. An efficiency factor of 75–90% for the thermal energy recovery via a heat exchanger is suggested by other researchers in the field [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. In this study, an efficiency factor of 80 was selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, thanks to its environmental and economic benefits, anaerobic digestion (AD) is considered to be the best option for managing WAS [3]. It is widely used as the most cost-effective way for stabilization, pathogen removal, and energy recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%