2000
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3927(20001101)21:17<1191::aid-marc1191>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of methylaluminoxane separated by porous inorganic materials on the isospecific polymerization of propylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SBA-15 has a wall thickness of 3.8 nm, while in SBA-15 synthesized with decane the wall thickness is 2.2 nm; for the 22.7 nm support was not possible to calculate the wall thickness due to the weak reflexions in the diffractogram. Moreover, a pore diameter around 11 nm must be an optimum pore size for SBA-15 materials and MAO/(nBuCp) 2 ZrCl 2 system in slurry ethylene polymerization, since it should be small enough for MAO stabilization through the carrier sieve effect, as mentioned in the introduction section according to Sano et al [23][24][25] On the contrary, at higher 1-hexene concentrations, the silica supported catalyst is the most active. The polymer that grows at such 1-hexene concentrations is less crystalline and consequently, less rigid to fragment the support particles effectively, so a support with bigger pore volume and therefore, the more brittle one will lead to higher catalytic activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SBA-15 has a wall thickness of 3.8 nm, while in SBA-15 synthesized with decane the wall thickness is 2.2 nm; for the 22.7 nm support was not possible to calculate the wall thickness due to the weak reflexions in the diffractogram. Moreover, a pore diameter around 11 nm must be an optimum pore size for SBA-15 materials and MAO/(nBuCp) 2 ZrCl 2 system in slurry ethylene polymerization, since it should be small enough for MAO stabilization through the carrier sieve effect, as mentioned in the introduction section according to Sano et al [23][24][25] On the contrary, at higher 1-hexene concentrations, the silica supported catalyst is the most active. The polymer that grows at such 1-hexene concentrations is less crystalline and consequently, less rigid to fragment the support particles effectively, so a support with bigger pore volume and therefore, the more brittle one will lead to higher catalytic activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the different natures of S ext and S int sites could be also explained according to Sano et al, [23][24][25] who proposed changes in the MAO structure due to the pore size. Therefore, it is possible that, as a result of the different MAO structures existing in the pore openings and inside, the 1-hexene reactivity ratio of S ext and S int sites is different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interaction between MAO/metallocene catalytic system and silica-alumina surface. (nBuCp) 2 ZrCl 2 supported on MAO-treated mesoporous molecular sieves and, by Sano et al [29][30][31][32] for the slurry polymerization of ethylene with Cp 2 ZrCl 2 supported on mesoporous materials that have been soaked in a MAO solution. Several works proposed that the MAO species responsible for activating metallocenes consist of a cyclic cage structure made from (AlOCH 3 ) 12 units [33][34][35], which could interact with the support pore surface.…”
Section: Polymerization Activity and Polyethylene Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%