1984
DOI: 10.2320/jinstmet1952.48.11_1041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of Mg, S and Graphitization Rate on the Spheroidization of Graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although the strips were prerolled, there are significantly fewer temper graphite particles in this region than in other regions. As mentioned earlier, Lee et al [4,19,20] investigated how plastic deformation affects the graphitization of Mg treated white iron. Carbon atoms will precipitate into microvoids or pores, resulting in the formation of spheroidal graphite during annealing.…”
Section: Function Of Thickness Reductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, although the strips were prerolled, there are significantly fewer temper graphite particles in this region than in other regions. As mentioned earlier, Lee et al [4,19,20] investigated how plastic deformation affects the graphitization of Mg treated white iron. Carbon atoms will precipitate into microvoids or pores, resulting in the formation of spheroidal graphite during annealing.…”
Section: Function Of Thickness Reductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, the higher the cooling rate, the lower the Si content in the Si‐enriched zone of the carbide/austenite interface [18]. From the point of view of chemical composition, increasing carbon and/or, in particular, silicon contents as well as magnesium and sulphur contents contribute to accelerated graphite formation [19–21]. The literature contains different information on the limit temperature at which graphitization occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%